
Richard Van Noorden
Features Editor at Nature
Features editor, Nature. E: r⟦dot⟧vannoorden⟦at⟧nature⟦dot⟧com or richardvannoorden⟦at⟧protonmail⟦dot⟧com. Also @richvn on mastodon and bluesky.
Articles
-
1 week ago |
nature.com | Richard Van Noorden
What is the most highly cited paper in the scientific literature? Chances are slim that most researchers know the answer. It turns out to be a 1951 publication in the Journal of Biological Chemistry describing an assay to determine the amount of protein in a solution1. That has been cited more than 350,000 times in the Web of Science (WoS), a database that includes 98 million papers dating back to 1900.
-
1 week ago |
nature.com | Richard Van Noorden
Researchers advance by standing on the shoulders of giants, to paraphrase Isaac Newton. So, which research giants are still getting cited frequently today? One way of answering that is to determine which articles appear most often in the reference lists of today’s research papers. Nature asked three bibliometricians who study patterns of references in scientific publications to dig into the data.
-
2 months ago |
nature.com | Richard Van Noorden
Two days before the end of 2021, administrators at Jining First People’s Hospital in Shandong, China, issued a highly unusual report. The hospital announced that it had disciplined some 35 researchers who had been linked to fraud in publications, such as fabricating data. These sanctions were part of a countrywide crackdown motivated by concerns about a flood of sham medical papers emanating from hospitals.
-
Dec 18, 2024 |
nature.com | Richard Van Noorden
A study that stoked enthusiasm for the now-disproven idea that a cheap malaria drug can treat COVID-19 has been retracted — more than four-and-a-half years after it was published1. Access the most recent journalism from Nature's award-winning team Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research or
-
Dec 18, 2024 |
nature.com | Richard Van Noorden
A huge collaboration has confirmed growing concerns that fake or flawed research is polluting medical systematic reviews, which summarize evidence from multiple clinical trials and shape treatment guidelines worldwide. The study is part of an effort to address the problem by creating a short checklist that will help researchers to spot untrustworthy trials.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 7K
- Tweets
- 5K
- DMs Open
- Yes

RT @colin_fraser: Good example of the collapsing to the mode thing I’m always talking about, how the latent space is actually quite small c…

RT @dcastelvecchi: The @ESAGaia spacecraft was moved out to a graveyard orbit and decommissioned today — but much of its discoveries are ye…

RT @AlessandroStru4: «Some researchers told Nature they felt pressured to back the FCC». «One persuasive argument for the FCC is that it ca…