Robert J. Sneckenberg

Jan 8, 2025 | mondaq.com | Stephen J. McBrady |Skye Mathieson |Michelle Coleman |Robert J. Sneckenberg

CM Crowell & Moring LLP More Our founders aspired to create a different kind of law firm when they launched Crowell & Moring in 1979. From those bold beginnings, our mission has been to provide our clients with the best services of any law firm in the world through a spirit of trust, respect, cooperation, collaboration, and a commitment to giving back to the communities around us.

Nov 12, 2024 | mondaq.com | Anuj Vohra |Robert J. Sneckenberg |Stephanie Crawford |Zachary Schroeder

On November 12, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will issue an interim rule amending FAR 52.204-7 to clarify that an offeror's failure to maintain System for Award Management (SAM) registration during the period between proposal submission and contract award does not render the offeror ineligible for award.

Jun 14, 2024 | mondaq.com | Robert J. Sneckenberg |Issac Schabes |Emily Golchini

In Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States, the Federal Circuit considered Percipient.ai Inc.'s (Percipient) protest arising out of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency's (NGA) SAFFIRE procurement, for the improvement of the agency's production, storage, and integration of geospatial intelligence data. Percipient's protest was unusual—filed in 2023, it related to a task order NGA awarded to CACI, Inc. (CACI) two years earlier, for which Percipient did not (and could not) bid.

Apr 12, 2024 | mondaq.com | Robert J. Sneckenberg |Anuj Vohra

Crowell & Moring's "All Things Protest" podcast keeps you up to date on major trends in bid protest litigation, key developments in high-profile cases, and best practices in state and federal procurement. In this episode, Rob Sneckenberg and Anuj Vohra discuss a recent Federal Circuit decision that may open new doors for prospective protesters. Materials Discussed in This Episode: Avue Technologies Corp. v. HHS (Fed. Cir. Mar.

Feb 22, 2024 | mondaq.com | Robert J. Sneckenberg |Issac Schabes

Offerors understand that missing a submission deadline can sink even the best proposal because "late is late." But what happens when an offeror timely emails its proposal only to have an agency server reject it without any notification to the offeror? GAO's recent decision in Guidehouse, Inc., B-422115.2, Jan. 19, 2024, says that the proposal is still late and emphasizes the potentially draconian impact of the "late is late" rule.