Rush Doshi

Nov 30, 2024 | independent.ng | Rush Doshi

… Rebuilding American Strength Will Take Buy-In at Home and Abroad—and From Trump Himself Predicting the incoming Trump administration’s China policy— and China’s likely response—is a guessing game. In his first term as president, Donald Trump’s transactional approach often differed from his team’s competitive approach. Those contrasting impulses will define his second term.

Oct 14, 2024 | gvwire.com | Rush Doshi

Opinion by Rush Doshi on Oct. 14, 2024. TRUMP REMAINS WELL OUTSIDE A BIPARTISAN CONSENSUS ON COMPETING WITH CHINA. At the beginning of the Biden presidency, many of us serving in the National Security Council gathered to read the intelligence and reached a key conclusion: The 2020s would be what we called the “decisive decade” in U.S. competition with China. Beijing seeks to displace the United States from its global leadership position and is a formidable challenger.

Oct 14, 2024 | nytimes.com | Rush Doshi

At the beginning of the Biden presidency, many of us serving in the National Security Council gathered to read the intelligence and reached a key conclusion: The 2020s would be what we called the "decisive decade" in U.S. competition with China. Beijing seeks to displace the United States from its global leadership position and is a formidable challenger.

Sep 24, 2024 | cfr.org | Rush Doshi

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Senate Committee Holds Hearing to Examine Conflicts of Interest in Federal Contracting Senate Committee Holds Hearing to Examine Conflicts of Interest in Federal Contracting Chairman Peters, Ranking Member Paul, distinguished members of the Committee, thank you very much for the opportunity to testify at today’s hearing on conflicts of interest in federal contracting.

May 30, 2024 | foreignaffairs.com | Matt Pottinger |Rush Doshi |Jessica Weiss

Rush DoshiIn “No Substitute for Victory” (May/June 2024), Matt Pottinger and Mike Gallagher raise important concerns about the Biden administration’s China policy. But their analysis misses the mark. Their review of key episodes in the administration’s China policy is inaccurate, and they propose steps that the administration is already taking.