
Articles
-
1 month ago |
roughnotes.com | Sam Berman
Leveraging face-to-face relationshipswith potential insurance clients When you are giving the rundown of coverage, do so by using examples of incidents that anyone can understand. … [R]eal-world scenarios that you can walk a prospect through to explain policies are helpful. By Michael WayneAs an insurance professional, was there anything that struck you as particularly odd about Super Bowl LIX? Of course, that is assuming you watched the broadcast. No, I’m not referring to questionable officiating.
-
1 month ago |
roughnotes.com | Sam Berman
What role can they play in property insurance? [S]eparate wildfire deductibles could be critical in securing coverage for a peril that is location-specific yet popping up all across the continent. By Joseph S. Harrington, CPCUIf they work for windstorms, can they work for wildfires? “They” in this case are peril-specific deductibles in property insurance policies that are higher than the basic policy deductible for other perils.
-
1 month ago |
roughnotes.com | Sam Berman
INSURANCE-RELATED COURT CASESDigested from case reports published onlineCOURT DECISIONSBarging inIn 2014, Swalling Construction Company, Inc., entered into a charter agreement with Pool Engineering, Inc., for a freight barge. Swalling obtained insurance through Alaska USA Insurance Brokers, LLC, which in turn obtained insurance from Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company. Upon Swalling’s return of the barge, Pool discovered damage to the hull.
-
1 month ago |
roughnotes.com | Sam Berman
The conundrum of “water-related or “water damage”Anyone who is new to commercial insurance can quickly get tripped up by water-related claims. By Marc McNulty, CIC, CRMAnyone who is new to commercial insurance can quickly get tripped up by water-related claims. The CP 10 30 09 17 (Causes of Loss – Special Form) excludes a range of water-related situations but in turn provides coverage for “water damage,” which is a defined term within the form.
-
1 month ago |
roughnotes.com | Sam Berman
The current interpretation of theMcCarran-Ferguson Act is onlya specter of the law’s original intentThe belief that McCarran-Ferguson is just an antitrust exemption for the insurance industry is just another clever humbug. By Kevin P. HennosyMarch 9, 2025, is the 80th anniversary of the passage of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Do not expect a parade. Transit services will not waive fares.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →