Sarah Kliff's profile photo

Sarah Kliff

Investigative and Health Care Reporter at The New York Times

Investigations and health policy for the @nytimes. I like reading your medical bills.

Featured in: Favicon nytimes.com Favicon medium.com Favicon msn.com Favicon huffpost.com Favicon terra.com.br Favicon indiatimes.com Favicon washingtonpost.com Favicon webmd.com Favicon yahoo.com (+4) Favicon cnbc.com

Articles

  • 1 week ago | nytimes.com | Sarah Kliff |Margot Sanger-Katz

    The Senate policy bill released Monday would cut billions of dollars more from Medicaid than the earlier, House-passed legislation — in large part by cracking down on a budgeting maneuver used by 49 states that congressional Republicans have called a scam or gimmick. It does this by limiting Medicaid provider taxes, a loophole that states use to collect more federal matching funds for Medicaid, an insurance program for the poor that covers roughly 70 million Americans.

  • 3 weeks ago | nytimes.com | Sarah Kliff |Margot Sanger-Katz

    President Trump's domestic policy bill would make deep cuts to Obamacare that are expected to leave millions uninsured. The changes would make it harder to enroll in coverage and, for many, make plans more expensive. Republicans say these changes are needed to combat fraud and ensure government dollars go only to those who are eligible.

  • 3 weeks ago | nytimes.com | Sarah Kliff |Margot Sanger-Katz

    Though Republicans are not explicitly trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act, a series of small, technical changes would substantially reduce enrollment and increase the cost of coverage. Millions of Obamacare enrollees would lose health coverage under the Republicans' major policy bill, which would make coverage more expensive and harder to obtain.

  • 1 month ago | bostonglobe.com | Margot Sanger-Katz |Sarah Kliff

    Among the spending cuts proposed in House Republicans’ “big, beautiful bill” is a policy they have sought to enact for a decade: a requirement that Medicaid recipients provide proof of employment as a condition of receiving health insurance. Republicans have repeatedly tried and failed to enact such rules. They proposed laws that didn’t pass and attempted state-level experiments that were blocked in court.

  • 1 month ago | nytimes.com | Margot Sanger-Katz |Sarah Kliff

    A new hurdle for poor Americans, approved by the House, would cause millions to lose coverage, including many who are working but can't meet reporting rules. Among the spending cuts proposed in House Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" is a policy they have sought to enact for a decade: a requirement that Medicaid recipients provide proof of employment as a condition of receiving health insurance. Republicans have repeatedly tried and failed to enact such rules.

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →

X (formerly Twitter)

Followers
140K
Tweets
15K
DMs Open
Yes
Sarah Kliff
Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff
22 May 25

The Medicaid work requirement the House passed this morning is the strictest version of the policy that Congress has ever put forward. Diving into the details with @sangerkatz: https://t.co/ptCxQjDFtp

Sarah Kliff
Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff
16 May 25

Medicaid is a more cost-effective way to save lives than lots of other things the government pays for, like vehicle inspections or some cancer treatments. More from me + @sangerkatz on a big new Medicaid study: https://t.co/fQ7dl4PnmH https://t.co/yRkcEyxrB7

Sarah Kliff
Sarah Kliff @sarahkliff
16 May 25

A definitive new study, which uses detailed death and tax records for more than 37 million Americans, finds Medicaid expansion has saved over 27,000 lives. https://t.co/fQ7dl4PnmH