Seth Jaffe
Blogger at Law and the Environment Blog
Contributor at Freelance
Partner at @FoleyHoag with emphasis on environmental compliance and litigation. Co-author of the firm’s Law and the Environment blog
Articles
-
1 week ago |
openlegalblogarchive.org | Seth Jaffe
Posted on May 2, 2025 by Seth D. JaffeEarlier this week, my colleagues Adam Kahn and Kevin Chen posted about the proposed rule issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service that would rescind the definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act to exclude adverse impacts on habitat. As Adam and Kevin noted, FWS and NMFS rely in part on the recent Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v.
-
2 weeks ago |
mondaq.com | Daniel Carlston |Seth Jaffe |Sarah Main
Amidst continued optimism from the Trump Administration ongeothermal energy as compared to other renewable energy sources,some private companies are looking to achieve their stated cleanenergy goals by turning to geothermal projects, including forlarge-scale heating and cooling.
Does Mastercard’s Plan for Geothermal Heating and Cooling Herald a Geothermal Revolution? | JD Supra
2 weeks ago |
jdsupra.com | Daniel Carlston |Seth Jaffe |Sarah Main
Amidst continued optimism from the Trump Administration on geothermal energy as compared to other renewable energy sources, some private companies are looking to achieve their stated clean energy goals by turning to geothermal projects, including for large-scale heating and cooling.
-
2 weeks ago |
mondaq.com | Seth Jaffe
Earlier this week, my colleagues Adam Kahn and Kevin Chen posted about the proposed rule issued by the Fish and WildlifeService and the National Marine Fisheries Service that wouldrescind the definition of "harm" under the EndangeredSpecies Act to exclude adverse impacts on habitat. As Adam andKevin noted, FWS and NMFS rely in part on the recent Supreme Courtdecision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo,stating that the "single, best meaning" of the statuteexcludes such habitat impact.
-
3 weeks ago |
jdsupra.com | Seth Jaffe
Earlier this week, my colleagues Adam Kahn and Kevin Chen posted about the proposed rule issued by the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service that would rescind the definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act to exclude adverse impacts on habitat. As Adam and Kevin noted, FWS and NMFS rely in part on the recent Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, stating that the “single, best meaning” of the statute excludes such habitat impact.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 208
- Tweets
- 3K
- DMs Open
- No
A proposed rule issued on Apr. 17, 2025 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service would rescind the regulatory definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act. The comment period ends on May 19, 2025. https://t.co/FKCgxCd5gW
In an Apr. 21, 2025 Harvard Kennedy School Energy Policy Seminar, Basil Seggos will explore the question: can state leaders re-emerge as a bulwark on environmental protection amidst an unprecedented attack from the Trump administration? https://t.co/SRaKHrlDnf
Josh Rosen is attending the 2025 NECA Environmental Conference, Getting to Net Zero: Tools, Resources & Strategies, which will will bring together industry experts to discuss what their organizations are doing to meet Net Zero goals. https://t.co/sk2TLQw9W8