Shanaya Cyrus Irani

Apr 25, 2024 | lexology.com | Farhad Sorabjee |Shanaya Cyrus Irani |Siddhesh S Pradhan |Meher Mistri

A single bench of the Bombay High Court (“Bombay HC”) has in Cardinal Energy and Infra Structure Private Limited & Anr. v. Subramanya Construction and Development Co. Limited & Ors.1 held that the power to implead a nonsignatory to an arbitration proceeding vests in an arbitral tribunal on the basis of the group of companies doctrine laid down in Cox and Kings Limited v. SAP India Private Limited & Anr2 (“Cox and Kings”).

Aug 9, 2023 | mondaq.com | Farhad Sorabjee |Shanaya Cyrus Irani |Siddhesh S Pradhan

A Special Leave Petition to the Supreme Court against an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in its appellate jurisdiction is not maintainable. The Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") has in M/s. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited v.

Aug 7, 2023 | lexology.com | Farhad Sorabjee |Shanaya Cyrus Irani |Siddhesh S Pradhan

The Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) has in M/s. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited v. Suresh Chand Jain & Anr. held that a petition filed before the Supreme Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India (“Constitution”) seeking special leave to appeal against an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (“NCDRC”) in its appellate jurisdiction is not maintainable.

Jul 30, 2023 | mondaq.com | Farhad Sorabjee |Shanaya Cyrus Irani |Siddhesh S Pradhan |Meher Mistri

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal at Chennai ("NCLAT") has in M/s. KK Ropeways Limited v. M/s Billion Smiles Hospitality Private Limited1 inter alia held that an arbitral award cannot be enforced under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("IBC") when a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act") has been preferred against such an award.

Jul 25, 2023 | lexology.com | Farhad Sorabjee |Shanaya Cyrus Irani |Siddhesh S Pradhan |Meher Mistri

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal at Chennai (“NCLAT”) has in M/s. KK Ropeways Limited v. M/s Billion Smiles Hospitality Private Limited1 inter alia held that an arbitral award cannot be enforced under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) when a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) has been preferred against such an award.