Sophia Chen

1 week ago | technologyreview.es | Sophia Chen

IBM ha anunciado planes detallados para construir un ordenador cuántico con corrección de errores con una capacidad de cálculo significativamente mayor que las máquinas existentes para 2028. Espera poner el ordenador a disposición de los usuarios a través de la nube en 2029. La máquina propuesta, denominada Starling, consistirá en una red de módulos, cada uno de los cuales contiene un conjunto de chips, alojados en un nuevo centro de datos en Poughkeepsie, Nueva York (EE UU).

1 week ago | medium.com | Sophia Chen

From Reactive Reporting to Proactive PartnershipIn 2023, I shared a series of notes on Chinese social media platform Rednote about data science practices, drawing from my experience as a product analyst at Intuit and Google. Revisiting these notes recently, I found the content still highly relevant for most data science analytics teams in tech companies today, particularly in their transition from reactive reporting to proactive partnership with business.

2 weeks ago | heise.de | Sophia Chen

IBM will mit einer neuen Ansage im Wettlauf um Quantencomputer die Konkurrenz überholen: Das Unternehmen hat detaillierte Pläne bekannt gegeben, bis 2028 einen Quantencomputer mit Fehlerkorrektur und deutlich höherer Rechenleistung als bestehende Maschinen zu bauen. Den Computer will man dann bis 2029 über die Cloud verfügbar machen. Damit hält IBM weiterhin an den 2020 ausgerufenen Plänen fest.

2 weeks ago | technologyreview.com | Sophia Chen

IBM announced detailed plans today to build an error-corrected quantum computer with significantly more computational capability than existing machines by 2028. It hopes to make the computer available to users via the cloud by 2029. The proposed machine, named Starling, will consist of a network of modules, each of which contains a set of chips, housed within a new data center in Poughkeepsie, New York.

4 weeks ago | mittechreview.com.br | Sophia Chen

Quando engenheiros alemães e suíços construíram uma ponte sobre o Reno em 2003, algo saiu errado: os lados não se encontraram. O alemão estava 54 centímetros acima do suíço. O desalinhamento ocorreu porque os engenheiros alemães haviam medido a elevação com um nível histórico do Mar do Norte como ponto zero, enquanto os suíços haviam usado o Mar Mediterrâneo, que estava 27 centímetros mais baixo.