Steve McBrady

Jan 29, 2024 | lexblog.com | Steve McBrady |Nicole Owren-Wiest |Michelle Coleman |Charles Baek

In Aviation Training Consulting, LLC, ASBCA No. 63634 (Jan. 11, 2024), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) confirmed that a contractor’s properly asserted claim for relief under Section 3610 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act is a claim under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) and denied the Air Force’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Jan 5, 2024 | lexblog.com | Steve McBrady |Skye Mathieson |Michelle Coleman |Eric Herendeen

Skye Mathieson is a partner in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He works with and advises clients from diverse industries on a wide array of matters, including contract performance disputes (CDA claims and equitable adjustments), cost allowability…Skye Mathieson is a partner in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office.

Dec 13, 2023 | lexblog.com | Steve McBrady |Skye Mathieson |John Nakoneczny |Tyler Roddy Piper

n Flatland Realty, LLC, ASBCA No. 63409, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board) granted an appeal seeking damages, plus interest, from an improper termination for default.  In an uncommon result, the Board awarded lost profit expectancy damages because the government had improperly terminated the contract, which did not incorporate a termination for convenience clause. The underlying contract was a 15-year lease by the government to the contractor for the operation of a concession.

Nov 8, 2023 | lexblog.com | Steve McBrady |Skye Mathieson |Michelle Coleman |Eric Herendeen

Skye Mathieson is a partner in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office. He works with and advises clients from diverse industries on a wide array of matters, including contract performance disputes (CDA claims and equitable adjustments), cost allowability…Skye Mathieson is a partner in the Government Contracts Group in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office.

Jun 9, 2023 | lexblog.com | Steve McBrady |Skye Mathieson |Michelle Coleman |Eric Herendeen

On May 15, 2023, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (“ASBCA” or “the Board”) in J&J Maintenance, Inc., d/b/a J&J Worldwide Services, ASBCA No. 63013 issued an instructive analysis of its jurisdiction to hear monetary and nonmonetary claims. Partially granting a government motion to dismiss, the ASBCA explained that, if a contractor does not seek monetary relief in its claim to the contracting officer (“CO”), then the contractor cannot seek monetary relief on appeal to the Board.