Articles

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →

Coverage map

X (formerly Twitter)

Followers
112K
Tweets
235K
DMs Open
No
Tim Kawakami
Tim Kawakami @timkawakami
11 Apr 25

Where was Noah Wylie when I needed him!!!!

I am Responsiblish
I am Responsiblish @dan_man_25

@timkawakami And here I thought watching The Pitt was more stressful!

Tim Kawakami
Tim Kawakami @timkawakami
11 Apr 25

1) My bad for presuming division-tie rules carried through. 2) In this case, LAST UPDATE in this 3-team 49-33 tie scenario: -MIN would get 5 seed with cumulative 4-3 record -Warriors would get 6 (with a 4-4 cumulative) -And LACs (with 3-4 cumulative) would get 7 Good night!

Hardwood Paroxysm
Hardwood Paroxysm @HPbasketball

This is incorrect. You can refer to subclause (a) found at the bottom of this page: https://t.co/v79OCIVAcD You don't reset after initial tiebreak UNLESS you're deciding division winner or teams are tied after cumulative. Cumulative record for Warriors-Wolves-Clippers will https://t.co/VZ2pfqmqIL

Tim Kawakami
Tim Kawakami @timkawakami
11 Apr 25

If my last recalculation is correct (*BIG IF), GSWs really really want LACs to lose tomorrow in SAC. And if that doesn't happen, LACs getting swept by MIN in the season series will be quite damaging to GSWs' seeding.

Tim Kawakami
Tim Kawakami @timkawakami

OK I give up. Too late for this. One more run through this ONE 3-TEAM SCENARIO and yes, MIN would win the cumulative at 4-3 and get the 5. Then Warriors-LACs tiebreak goes to LACs in head-to-head, so LACs get 6 and GSWs get 7, even if they win out in this scenario. I AM DONE