
Upasana Sajeev
Legal Correspondent at Live Law
Lawyer | Legal Correspondent @LiveLawIndia | Mail: [email protected]
Articles
-
1 week ago |
livelaw.in | Upasana Sajeev
Senior Advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for TASMAC was making submissions before the bench of Justice SM Subramaniam and Justice K Rajasekaran. “I'll tell you how the ED works. The Tamil Nadu election is next year. So they'll start this year. Look up old FIRs and start roving and fishing inquiry. They are taking up matters to some kind of result to tarnish the image of people involved in the Election. Why are they suddenly dreaming that the Tamil Nadu excise department is corrupt?” Singh argued.
-
1 week ago |
livelaw.in | Upasana Sajeev
Legendary music composer Ilayaraja has sent a legal notice to Mythri Movie Makers against the unauthorized use of his musical works in the new Ajith starrer movie "Good Bad Ugly".
-
1 week ago |
livelaw.in | Upasana Sajeev
The bench of Justice J Nisha Banu and Justice S Srimathy held that the Government had powers to prescribe the minimum educational qualification for the appointment of teachers and the government had prescribed the TET qualification under such power. Thus, the court held that the qualification was mandatory.
-
1 week ago |
livelaw.in | Upasana Sajeev
Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 132 To 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 137 NOMINAL INDEX B Karthick v. The Inspector of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 132The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise v. Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 133A Arunkumar v. The Home Secretary to Government and others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 134Gowdham v. The Director General and Others, 2025 LiveLaw... Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 132 To 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 137 NOMINAL INDEX B Karthick v.
-
1 week ago |
livelaw.in | Upasana Sajeev
Justice KK Ramakrishnan held that the recovery officer was guilty of conscious misconduct as he had flagrantly violated all the norms and legal requirements and acted contrarily to the norms, conducting the auction without fixing proper upset price. The court added that the recovery officer was a public officer and a trustee for the public. Thus, the court remarked that the officer was duty bound to protect, preserve the property entrusted with him.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →Coverage map
X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 559
- Tweets
- 1K
- DMs Open
- No

RT @LiveLawIndia: In a significant judgment underscoring the constitutional role of Governors, the Supreme Court has called upon them to ac…

RT @LiveLawIndia: In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Tuesday (April 8) set time limits for the decisions by the Governors unde…

RT @LiveLawIndia: #BREAKING| Supreme Court also declared that the 10 bills would be deemed to have got the Governor's assent when they were…