Top Class Actions

6 days ago | topclassactions.com | Jessy Edwards

Who: A Massachusetts woman, plaintiff Zoila Lema, filed a class action lawsuit against Nuna Baby Essentials. Why: Lema claims Nuna is responsible for a data breach that exposed customer payment card information. Where: The class action lawsuit was filed in Pennsylvania federal court. Nuna Baby Essentials is facing a class action lawsuit over claims it failed to properly secure and safeguard its customers’ payment card information that was then exposed in a data breach.

6 days ago | topclassactions.com | Jessy Edwards

Who: A California federal judge denied a motion to dismiss a call recording class action lawsuit filed against Lush Handmade Cosmetics LLC. Why: Lush had argued that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over the company and that the plaintiff’s claims were insufficient. Where: The Lush call recording class action lawsuit was filed in California federal court. A California federal judge has allowed a class action lawsuit against Lush Handmade Cosmetics LLC to proceed.

6 days ago | topclassactions.com | Jessy Edwards

Who: A Texas resident filed a class action lawsuit against Vexus Fiber. Why: The plaintiff claims Vexus Fiber misleads consumers about the cost of its broadband internet service by charging a “junk fee” for access to its network. Where: The Vexus Fiber class action lawsuit was filed in Texas federal court. A new class action lawsuit alleges Vexus Fiber misleads consumers about the cost of its broadband internet service by charging a “junk fee” for access to its network.

6 days ago | topclassactions.com | Jessy Edwards

Who: Cargill Kitchen Solutions is recalling about 212,000 pounds of liquid egg products, including Egg Beaters brand liquid eggs. Why: Cargill is initiating the recall over potential contamination with a cleaning solution containing sodium hypochlorite. Where: The Egg Beaters recall affects distributors in Ohio and Texas, and food service use in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, and Iowa, with the possibility of nationwide distribution.

1 week ago | topclassactions.com | Jessy Edwards

A California federal jury found that Bigelow committed fraud and violated the state’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act after a consumer sued the tea company, alleging it advertises its tea as being 100% manufactured in the USA when the products are actually composed solely of foreign-sourced and processed tea. The jury reached its verdict on April 8 after a five-day trial and awarded a class of California tea buyers $2.36 million in damages.