Alan Rozenshtein

Featured in: Favicon

msn.com

theatlantic.com Favicon

brookings.edu Favicon

acm.org

foreignpolicy.com Favicon

reason.com Favicon

realclearpolitics.com Favicon

lawfareblog.com Favicon

unirioja.es Favicon

historynewsnetwork.org + 3 more

Articles

Rational Security: The “Hi, Robot!” Edition

1 week ago | lawfaremedia.org | Daniel Byman |Scott Anderson |Alan Rozenshtein |Kevin Frazier

Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With This week, Scott sat down with the AI-oriented Lawfare Senior Editors Alan Rozenshtein and Kevin Frazier to talk through the week’s top AI-focused news stories, including: “Oh Sure, Now He’s Into Free Trade.” President Trump has repealed the Biden administration’s rule setting strict limits on the diffusion of high-end AI technology, opening the door to the global transfer of the technologies powering U.S. AI development, including...
Rational Security: The 'Thelma or Louise' Edition

1 week ago | lawfaremedia.org | Jen Patja |Alan Rozenshtein |Quinta Jurecic |Scott Anderson

Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott reunited on our new recording day to talk through the week’s big national security news, including:“Blocked and Muted.” Earlier this week, the Washington Post published a draft report by the Jan.
The Situation: And What If He Meant It?

2 weeks ago | lawfaremedia.org | Alan Rozenshtein |Benjamin Wittes

The Situation on Friday objected to recognition of Michael Flynn at the National Symphony. Today let’s talk seashells. Former FBI Director James Comey sent the MAGA world into a tizzy last week by sharing on social media a picture of seashells arranged to say “8647” on the beach. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said he should be in jail for threatening President Trump.
Rational Security 2.0: The 'Truth Fairy' Edition

3 weeks ago | lawfaremedia.org | Jen Patja |Alan Rozenshtein |Quinta Jurecic |Scott Anderson

This week, Alan, Quinta and Scott were joined by Jeffrey Kosseff, cybersecurity law professor at the U.S. Naval Academy, to hash through some of the week's big national security news, including: “One Letter Off KGB, Two Letters Away from DGAF.” The Department of Homeland Security has taken heat this week for creating an internal Disinformation Governance Board, which partisan critics have railed against as a federal “Ministry of Truth” responsible for policing speech.
D.C. Circuit Upholds Narcoterrorism Conviction in United States v. Mohammed

1 month ago | lawfaremedia.org | Daniel Byman |Alan Rozenshtein

Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With Yesterday the D.C. Circuit issued its decision in United States v. Mohammed, in which the defendant, Afghan citizen Khan Mohammed, appealed his conviction on narcoterrorism charges stemming from his involvement in a plot to attack a NATO base in Afghanistan.
Lawfare Daily: Chris Miller and Marshall Kosloff on the Abundance Agenda’s Implications for National Security

Feb 11, 2025 | lawfaremedia.org | Kevin Frazier |Alan Rozenshtein |Christopher Miller |Marshall Kosloff

Chris Miller, a professor at the Fletcher School at Tufts University and Nonresident Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and Marshall Kosloff, Senior Fellow at the Niskanen Center and co-host of the Realignment Podcast, join Kevin Frazier, a Contributing Editor at Lawfare and adjunct professor at Delaware Law, and Alan Rozenshtein, Senior Editor at Lawfare and associate professor of law at the University of Minnesota, to discuss AI, supply chains, and the Abundance Agenda.
What If Free Speech Means Banning TikTok?

Dec 13, 2024 | theatlantic.com | Alan Rozenshtein

A federal court is floating a new framework for thinking about the First Amendment in the age of social media. Many will read last week’s federal appeals-court opinion that could ban TikTok as a loss for the First Amendment, and in some ways it is. If TikTok disappears from the United States, some 170 million Americans will lose access to a platform central to their daily lives and creative expression.
Interpreting the Ambiguities of Section 230

Apr 17, 2024 | yalejreg.com | Alan Rozenshtein

As evidenced by the confusion expressed by multiple Justices in last Term’s Gonzalez v. Google, there is little consensus as to the scope of Section 230, the law that broadly immunizes internet platforms from liability for third-party content.
Saving the News: Why the Constitution Calls for Government Action to Preserve Freedom of Speech

Feb 26, 2024 | dialnet.unirioja.es | Alan Rozenshtein

IdiomacatalàDeutschEnglishespañoleuskarafrançaisgalegoitalianoportuguêsromână
Interpreting the ambiguities of Section 230

Oct 26, 2023 | brookings.edu | Alan Rozenshtein

No statute has had a bigger impact on the internet than Section 230. The law, which prevents any online platform from being “treated as the publisher or speaker” of third-party content, has enabled the business models of the technology giants that dominate the digital public sphere.