-
1 week ago | 
lawfaremedia.org | Daniel Byman |Alan Rozenshtein
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Yesterday the D.C. Circuit issued its decision in United States v. Mohammed, in which the defendant, Afghan citizen Khan Mohammed, appealed his conviction on narcoterrorism charges stemming from his involvement in a plot to attack a NATO base in Afghanistan.
-
Feb 11, 2025 | 
lawfaremedia.org | Kevin Frazier |Alan Rozenshtein |Christopher Miller |Marshall Kosloff
Chris Miller, a professor at the Fletcher School at Tufts University and Nonresident Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and Marshall Kosloff, Senior Fellow at the Niskanen Center and co-host of the Realignment Podcast, join Kevin Frazier, a Contributing Editor at Lawfare and adjunct professor at Delaware Law, and Alan Rozenshtein, Senior Editor at Lawfare and associate professor of law at the University of Minnesota, to discuss AI, supply chains, and the Abundance Agenda.
-
Dec 13, 2024 | 
theatlantic.com | Alan Rozenshtein
A federal court is floating a new framework for thinking about the First Amendment in the age of social media. Many will read last week’s federal appeals-court opinion that could ban TikTok as a loss for the First Amendment, and in some ways it is. If TikTok disappears from the United States, some 170 million Americans will lose access to a platform central to their daily lives and creative expression.
-
Apr 17, 2024 | 
yalejreg.com | Alan Rozenshtein
As evidenced by the confusion expressed by multiple Justices in last Term’s Gonzalez v. Google, there is little consensus as to the scope of Section 230, the law that broadly immunizes internet platforms from liability for third-party content.
-
Feb 26, 2024 | 
dialnet.unirioja.es | Alan Rozenshtein
IdiomacatalàDeutschEnglishespañoleuskarafrançaisgalegoitalianoportuguêsromână
-
Oct 26, 2023 | 
brookings.edu | Alan Rozenshtein
No statute has had a bigger impact on the internet than Section 230. The law, which prevents any online platform from being “treated as the publisher or speaker” of third-party content, has enabled the business models of the technology giants that dominate the digital public sphere.
-
Aug 15, 2023 | 
msn.com | Alan Rozenshtein
Many high-profile Republicans and conservatives are also coalescing around the First Amendment as their main avenue of attack on the indictment. Elise Stefanik, the fourth-ranking member of the House GOP, has claimed that “President Trump had every right under the First Amendment to correctly raise concerns about election integrity in 2020,” and several prominent Senate Republicans have made similar statements.
-
Aug 15, 2023 | 
msn.com | Alan Rozenshtein
Many high-profile Republicans and conservatives are also coalescing around the First Amendment as their main avenue of attack on the indictment. Elise Stefanik, the fourth-ranking member of the House GOP, has claimed that “President Trump had every right under the First Amendment to correctly raise concerns about election integrity in 2020,” and several prominent Senate Republicans have made similar statements.
-
Jun 27, 2023 | 
lawfareblog.com | Alan Rozenshtein
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Counterman v. Colorado, holding that when a defendant is prosecuted for communicating a violent threat, the government must establish that the defendant understood, even if they did not specifically intend, that their communication would likely be perceived as threatening.
-
Jun 18, 2023 | 
teknoholic.news | Alan Rozenshtein
The article is here; here is the introduction and the beginning of Part I:Current approaches to content moderation usually assume the continued dominance of “walled gardens”: social media platforms that control who can use their services and how.
