-
Oct 24, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Nooree Lee |Robert Huffman |Ryan Burnette |Moushmi Patil |August Gweon
On October 3, 2024, the White House Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) released Memorandum M-24-18, Advancing the Responsible Acquisition of Artificial Intelligence in Government (“October 2024 OMB Memo” or “Memo”), providing detailed new guidance and requirements for federal agency procurement of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”).
-
Sep 30, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Matthew S. Shapanka |August Gweon
On September 29, California Governor Gavin Newsom (D) vetoed the Safe & Secure Innovation for Frontier AI Models Act (SB 1047), putting an end, for now, to a months-long effort to establish public safety standards for developers of large AI systems.
-
Sep 30, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Brandon Gould |August Gweon
In the past several months, two state courts in the District of Columbia and California decided motions to dismiss in cases alleging that the use of certain revenue management software violated state antitrust laws in the residential property rental management and health insurance industries.
-
May 28, 2024 | 
lexology.com | August Gweon |Brandon Gould
On May 8, a Nevada federal court dismissed with prejudice a class action complaint alleging that several Las Vegas hotel operators violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by agreeing to set hotel room prices using pricing algorithms from the same vendor. The decision, Gibson v. Cendyn Group, No. 2:23-cv-00140 (D. Nev.
-
Apr 17, 2024 | 
lexblog.com | Holly Fechner |Matthew S. Shapanka |August Gweon
On April 2, the California Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (SB 1047) and favorably reported the bill in a 9-0 vote (with 2 members not voting). The vote marks a major step toward comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in a state that is home to both Silicon Valley and the nation’s first comprehensive privacy law.
-
Apr 17, 2024 | 
lexblog.com | Matthew S. Shapanka |August Gweon |Holly Fechner
On April 2, the California Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (SB 1047) and favorably reported the bill in a 9-0 vote (with 2 members not voting). The vote marks a major step toward comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in a state that is home to both Silicon Valley and the nation’s first comprehensive privacy law.
-
Apr 17, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Matthew S. Shapanka |August Gweon |Holly Fechner
On April 2, the California Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the Safe and Secure Innovation for Frontier Artificial Intelligence Models Act (SB 1047) and favorably reported the bill in a 9-0 vote (with 2 members not voting). The vote marks a major step toward comprehensive artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in a state that is home to both Silicon Valley and the nation’s first comprehensive privacy law.
-
Mar 14, 2024 | 
lexblog.com | Jennifer Johnson |August Gweon |Jayne Ponder
State lawmakers are pursuing a variety of legislative proposals aimed at regulating the development and use of artificial intelligence (“AI”). In the past two months, legislators in Florida, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington passed legislation regulating AI-generated content, and Utah’s legislature passed legislation regulating generative AI and establishing a state test bed for evaluating future AI regulations.
-
Mar 14, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Jennifer Johnson |August Gweon |Jayne Ponder
State lawmakers are pursuing a variety of legislative proposals aimed at regulating the development and use of artificial intelligence (“AI”). In the past two months, legislators in Florida, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington passed legislation regulating AI-generated content, and Utah’s legislature passed legislation regulating generative AI and establishing a state test bed for evaluating future AI regulations.
-
Feb 1, 2024 | 
lexology.com | David Fagan |Ashden Fein |Micaela R.h. McMurrough |John Leslie |Jayne Ponder |Shayan Karbassi | +3 more
On January 29, 2024, the Department of Commerce (“Department”) published a proposed rule (“Proposed Rule”) to require providers and foreign resellers of U.S. Infrastructure-as-a-Service (“IaaS”) products to (i) verify the identity of their foreign customers and (ii) notify the Department when a foreign person transacts with that provider or reseller to train a large artificial intelligence (“AI”) model with potential capabilities that could be used in malicious cyber-enabled activity.
