David Anthony

3 weeks ago | insidearm.com | John Culhane |David Anthony

The CFPB intends to revoke its Buy Now, Pay Later interpretive rule, according to a status report and joint motion to stay filed by the Bureau and the Financial Technology Association (FTA) in a case brought by the FTA challenging the rule. The revocation is one of several steps the Trump Administration is taking to reverse Biden Administration CFPB actions.

3 weeks ago | insidearm.com | David Anthony |John Culhane

Rochester, N.Y. —Continental Service Group, LLC d/b/a ConServe, in conjunction with the company’s “Matching Gift Program”, donated its March ConServe Cares proceeds to the American Heart Association. The ConServe team supports and funds the efforts of numerous local non-profit agencies that strive to make a difference. As a result of the employees’ compassion and generosity; countless lives have been touched and enriched in our community.

3 weeks ago | insidearm.com | David Anthony |Brooke Conkle |Stefanie Jackman |Jon Hubbard

On March 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a ruling addressing the obligations of furnishers under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) to conduct reasonable investigations of disputed information, whether the disputed information be legal or factual in nature. The issue of whether the distinction between “legal” and “factual” disputes is relevant under the FCRA has been hotly contested in recent years.

1 month ago | openlegalblogarchive.org | David Anthony |Stefanie Jackman |Ethan G. Ostroff |Mary C. Zinsner

On March 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration in two class-action lawsuits. The decision potentially has far-reaching implications for the enforceability of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, particularly those involving unilateral modification provisions. Case BackgroundThe appellants are companies that market and service credit card accounts on behalf of the credit-card issuing banks.

1 month ago | lexology.com | David Anthony |Stefanie Jackman |Ethan G. Ostroff |Mary C. Zinsner

On March 11, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration in two class-action lawsuits. The decision potentially has far-reaching implications for the enforceability of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts, particularly those involving unilateral modification provisions. Case BackgroundThe appellants are companies that market and service credit card accounts on behalf of the credit-card issuing banks.