
Articles
-
3 weeks ago |
creation.com | Jonathan Sarfati |Peter Williams |Drs Steve Kumar |Philip Bell
This article is from Creation 46(2):52–53, April 2024 Logical fallacies: How to spot and refute themBut we have the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16). Illustration: © Koctia | Envato ElementNo True ScotsmanThe No True Scotsman fallacy is an arbitrary re-definition of the meaning of a group. It is just an assertion that all group members must have this characteristic.
-
1 month ago |
creation.com | Russell Grigg |Drs Steve Kumar |Jonathan Sarfati
First of all, God bless you for defending the word of God! Regarding this particular issue I have some questions to point out:Scriptural:1-Lv 18.17b for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.
-
Jan 12, 2025 |
creation.com | Jonathan Sarfati |Peter Williams |Drs Steve Kumar
This article is from Creation 46(1):20–21, January 2024 Logical fallacies: How to spot and refute themIllustration: © Koctia | Envato ElementsChristians are supposed to be imitators of Jesus Christ. In John 1, He is called the ‘Word’, which in the original Greek is Logos/Λόγος, from which we derive the word logic. Jesus masterfully employed logic in His teachings; therefore, Christians should be logical in their reasoning.
-
Oct 29, 2024 |
creation.com | Jonathan Sarfati |Peter Williams |Drs Steve Kumar
This article is from Creation 45(4):36–37, October 2023 Logical fallacies: how to spot and refute themIllustration: © Koctia | Envato ElementsChristians are supposed to be imitators of Jesus Christ. In John 1, He is called the ‘Word’, which in the original Greek is Logos/Λόγος, from which we derive the word logic. Jesus masterfully employed logic in His teachings; therefore, Christians should be logical in their reasoning.
-
Oct 17, 2024 |
creation.com | Drs Steve Kumar |Jonathan Sarfati
Answering some critics of the argument from reasonFeedback archive → Feedback 2016If a rational God is not responsible for human minds, and instead they were cobbled together by unguided evolutionary processes, we should not expect them to be trustworthy. Since our minds are generally trustworthy, though, the evolutionary worldview must not be correct. This is one form of the ‘argument from reason’, covered in Monkey minds: How evolution undercuts reason and science.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →