
Philip Bell
Articles
-
3 weeks ago |
creation.com | Jonathan Sarfati |Peter Williams |Drs Steve Kumar |Philip Bell
This article is from Creation 46(2):52–53, April 2024 Logical fallacies: How to spot and refute themBut we have the mind of Christ (1 Corinthians 2:16). Illustration: © Koctia | Envato ElementNo True ScotsmanThe No True Scotsman fallacy is an arbitrary re-definition of the meaning of a group. It is just an assertion that all group members must have this characteristic.
-
Sep 9, 2024 |
creation.com | Philip Bell |Glen Scrivener |Drs Steve Kumar |Jonathan Sarfati
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0Sometimes, non-Christian people can surprise us with their perceptive statements about Christianity and Western society. For instance, I have written about atheist Frank Haviland’s bemusement at the way in which many church leaders deny core teachings of the faith they profess (The Church’s hole in the heart).1 Here are some more examples of insight from unbelievers. Matthew Parris is a British journalist and writer, formerly a politician.
-
May 1, 2024 |
creation.com | Philip Bell |Russell Grigg |Jonathan Sarfati |Lita Cosner Sanders
God reveals Himself to human beings in three main ways: in the physical creation, through the pages of Scripture, and through the person of Jesus Christ. Let’s look at the creation of the starry heavens. Composite (P. Bell)Composite (P. Bell)For those who acknowledge the Creator … this mind-bendingly vast cosmos is the handiwork of Christ the Creator. Astronomy teaches us a fantastic amount about the magnificent Cosmos, but we should keep in mind that it is ultimately an imperfect revelation.
-
Mar 25, 2024 |
creation.com | Andrew Sibley |Philip Bell |Russell Grigg
PixabayWriting in the February edition of Christianity Magazine (UK) David Instone-Brewer suggests that Cain was forced to marry an intelligent animal.
-
Mar 13, 2024 |
creation.com | Robert Carter |Philip Bell
And how much variation is tolerable? Credit: Zephyris, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Anyone who’s been paying attention to the science of genomics knows that the question, “How much of the genome is functional?” is hugely contentious. The ‘junk DNA’ hypothesis has been the ruling paradigm for decades, and recent discoveries that highlight the functionality of the non-coding regions of the genome have been slow to win acceptance. It is true that only about 2% of the genome codes for protein.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →