Articles

  • Jan 17, 2025 | law.com | Edward T. Kang

    Two doctrines frequently arise in Pennsylvania jurisprudence when addressing disputes between the parties to a contract: the parol evidence rule and the gist of the action doctrine. While each serves a distinct purpose, their application often overlaps, especially in fraud cases between the parties to a contract. Understanding both rules is essential for practitioners to craft persuasive arguments. The parol evidence rule’s purpose is to preserve written contracts’ integrity.

  • Nov 27, 2024 | law.com | Edward T. Kang

    Nearly a century ago, U.S. Spureme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis praised the tradition of federalism in his dissent in New State Ice v. Liebmann, which popularized the term “laboratory of democracy.” Brandeis underscored that states, using their sovereign power, have the freedom to experiment with new legislation that responds to the evolving needs of their citizens. Decades later, in his dissent in Michigan v.

  • Nov 7, 2024 | law.com | Edward T. Kang

    Who Got The Work Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct.

  • Oct 17, 2024 | law.com | Edward T. Kang

    Who Got The Work Blank Rome partner Andrew T. Hambelton has stepped in to defend Fragrancenet.com in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Aug. 29 in New York Southern District Court by the Blakely Law Group, targets the defendants for allegedly selling counterfeit fragrance products. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Lorna G. Schofield, is 1:24-cv-06521, Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Quester (US) Enterprises, Inc. et al.

  • Aug 30, 2024 | law.com | Edward T. Kang

    Recently, I received an email from a national public interest organization dedicated to whistleblower advocacy. The message asked whether a relator (i.e., a whistleblower), while not a victim of fraud, has standing to seek corporate veil-piercing in a False Claims Act case where the government declined to intervene. It is an interesting question, and no one seems to know the answer.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →