Elina Brutschin

Aug 27, 2024 | nature.com | Christoph Bertram |Elina Brutschin |Laurent Drouet |Gunnar Luderer |Bas van Ruijven |Lara Aleluia Reis | +22 more

Correction to: Nature Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02073-4, published online 12 August 2024. In the version of the article initially published, there was a typographical error in the main text and an error in Extended Data Fig. 1. The sentence comparing the social cost of carbon estimates had lacked the lower end of the range of values, and the figure showed means instead of medians of those social cost of carbon estimates, as well as data from an earlier version of ref. 43.

Aug 27, 2024 | nature.com | Christoph Bertram |Elina Brutschin |Laurent Drouet |Gunnar Luderer |Bas van Ruijven |Lara Aleluia Reis | +22 more

Correction to: Nature Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02073-4, published online 12 August 2024. In the version of the article initially published, there was a typographical error in the main text and an error in Extended Data Fig. 1. The sentence comparing the social cost of carbon estimates had lacked the lower end of the range of values, and the figure showed means instead of medians of those social cost of carbon estimates, as well as data from an earlier version of ref. 43.

Aug 12, 2024 | nature.com | Christoph Bertram |Elina Brutschin |Laurent Drouet |Gunnar Luderer |Bas van Ruijven |Lara Aleluia Reis | +22 more

AbstractDespite faster-than-expected progress in clean energy technology deployment, global annual CO2 emissions have increased from 2020 to 2023. The feasibility of limiting warming to 1.5 °C is therefore questioned. Here we present a model intercomparison study that accounts for emissions trends until 2023 and compares cost-effective scenarios to alternative scenarios with institutional, geophysical and technological feasibility constraints and enablers informed by previous literature.

Aug 12, 2024 | nature.com | Christoph Bertram |Elina Brutschin |Laurent Drouet |Gunnar Luderer |Bas van Ruijven |Lara Aleluia Reis | +22 more

AbstractDespite faster-than-expected progress in clean energy technology deployment, global annual CO2 emissions have increased from 2020 to 2023. The feasibility of limiting warming to 1.5 °C is therefore questioned. Here we present a model intercomparison study that accounts for emissions trends until 2023 and compares cost-effective scenarios to alternative scenarios with institutional, geophysical and technological feasibility constraints and enablers informed by previous literature.

May 27, 2024 | tandfonline.com | Felix Schenuit |Elina Brutschin |Oliver Geden |Fei Guo

ABSTRACTDeliberately removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is an important element of bringing mitigation pathways in line with the climate goals of the Paris Agreement. To reach global net-zero CO2 emissions and limit global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot, global mitigation pathways assessed by IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report require some world regions to achieve net-negative CO2 emissions with large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) deployment.