Elizabeth D. Ferrill

Jun 14, 2024 | mondaq.com | Forrest Jones |Luke MacDonald |Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C. et al, Nos. 2022-1621, 2022-1777 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2024), the Federal Circuit resolved cross appeals on an attorney's fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Below, the district court ordered a claim construction based on clear prosecution history disclaimer. This led the parties to stipulate to noninfringement, so the court issued a judgment of noninfringement. Dragon then appealed the noninfringement and underlying construction.

Jun 12, 2024 | lexology.com | Forrest Jones |Luke MacDonald |Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C. et al, Nos. 2022-1621, 2022-1777 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2024), the Federal Circuit resolved cross appeals on an attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Below, the district court ordered a claim construction based on clear prosecution history disclaimer. This led the parties to stipulate to noninfringement, so the court issued a judgment of noninfringement. Dragon then appealed the noninfringement and underlying construction.

Dec 19, 2023 | mondaq.com | Elizabeth D. Ferrill

Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit—a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community. In this episode, Beth Ferrill discusses recent design law cases from November. To listen to the podcast, click here. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Dec 12, 2023 | finnegan.com | Elizabeth D. Ferrill

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Aug 8, 2023 | mondaq.com | Ji-Hye Christina Yang |Elizabeth D. Ferrill |Michael Nielsen

In United Therapeutics Corp. v. Liquidia Techs., Inc., No. 22-2217 (Fed. Cir. July 24, 2023), the Federal Circuit affirmed a District of Delaware decision addressing claim construction, validity, and infringement. United Therapeutics (UT) filed a lawsuit against Liquidia for infringement of the '793 and '066 patents directed to methods of treating pulmonary hypertension and pharmaceutical compositions comprising Treprostinil.