Luke MacDonald

Featured in: Favicon

reuters.com Favicon

substack.com Favicon

jdsupra.com Favicon

lexology.com Favicon

mondaq.com Favicon

todaysgeneralcounsel.com Favicon

Articles

United States - Patent - Defendants Can Recover Fees For "Baseless" Infringement Allegations Even When Non-Infringement Decision Vacated As Moot By IPR, But Cannot Recover From Counsel Or For The Related IPR

Jun 14, 2024 | mondaq.com | Forrest Jones |Luke MacDonald |Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C. et al, Nos. 2022-1621, 2022-1777 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2024), the Federal Circuit resolved cross appeals on an attorney's fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Below, the district court ordered a claim construction based on clear prosecution history disclaimer. This led the parties to stipulate to noninfringement, so the court issued a judgment of noninfringement. Dragon then appealed the noninfringement and underlying construction.
Defendants Can Recover Fees for “Baseless” Infringement Allegations Even When Non-Infringement Decision Vacated as Moot by IPR, but Cannot Recover from Counsel or for the Related IPR

Jun 12, 2024 | lexology.com | Forrest Jones |Luke MacDonald |Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. Dish Network L.L.C. et al, Nos. 2022-1621, 2022-1777 (Fed. Cir. May 20, 2024), the Federal Circuit resolved cross appeals on an attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Below, the district court ordered a claim construction based on clear prosecution history disclaimer. This led the parties to stipulate to noninfringement, so the court issued a judgment of noninfringement. Dragon then appealed the noninfringement and underlying construction.

Contact details

Emails

[email protected]

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →