-
4 weeks ago | 
openlegalblogarchive.org | Swati Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey
The case of Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Maj. (Retd.) Sukesh Behl & Anr. is a landmark judgment in Indian patent law, particularly concerning Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and intellectual property enforcement. This judgment resolves three interconnected suits filed by the Plaintiff Philips relating to the infringement of Indian Patent No. 218255, which pertains to a “Method of Converting Information Words to a Modulated Signal”.
-
Oct 30, 2024 | 
thehindubusinessline.com | Swati Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey
A recent World Intellectual Property Office (WIPO) report said the number of GenAI patent families has surged dramatically, increasing from 733 in 2014 to more than 14,000 in 2023. Research output has also exploded, with scientific papers growing from 116 in 2014 to over 34,000 in 2023.
-
Sep 30, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Swati Goel Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sanya Rizvi
In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court recently addressed crucial issues surrounding trademark opposition proceedings in Coaster Shoes Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Registrar of Trademarks & Anr vide a judgment dated August 16, 2024. The Court highlighted the importance of procedural fairness and the responsibility of the Registrar of Trade Marks (“Registrar”) to ensure completeness of service in trademark disputes. BackgroundCoaster Shoes Company Pvt. Ltd.
-
Sep 23, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Swati Goel Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey
The Delhi High Court has recently rejected a BlackBerry Limited (hereinafter “Appellant”) appeal against the Assistant Controller of Patent’s refusal of its patent application in the field of wireless communication titled “Administration of Wireless Systems[1]”. The application was for an invention that manages wireless systems by configuring wireless client devices using both primary and secondary wireless servers. The ld.
-
Apr 22, 2024 | 
corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com | Swati Sharma |Gitika Suri |Toshita Jha
The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023 stands as a pivotal milestone in India’s commitment to preserving its rich natural heritage. The present article comprehensively explores the revisions made to this legislative framework and their implications on biodiversity management in the country.
-
Apr 22, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Swati Sharma |Gitika Suri |Toshita Jha
IntroductionThe Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023 stands as a pivotal milestone in India’s commitment to preserving its rich natural heritage. The present article comprehensively explores the revisions made to this legislative framework and their implications on biodiversity management in the country.
-
Apr 1, 2024 | 
corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com | Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) have undergone significant evolution in the recent past, and the increasing number of filings for different types of IP rights across the world show the increasing commitment of countries to foster innovation, creativity, and their desire to sustain it. In today’s rapidly evolving landscape of innovation and technology, securing intellectual property rights through patents has become paramount for businesses and inventors.
-
Apr 1, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Swati Goel Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey |Shailendra Kumar Shukla
IntroductionIntellectual Property Rights (IPR) have undergone significant evolution in the recent past, and the increasing number of filings for different types of IP rights across the world show the increasing commitment of countries to foster innovation, creativity, and their desire to sustain it. In today’s rapidly evolving landscape of innovation and technology, securing intellectual property rights through patents has become paramount for businesses and inventors.
-
Mar 13, 2024 | 
corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com | Swati Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC’s (hereinafter “Microsoft”) appeal against an order dated September 29, 2020, by which its Indian Patent Application No. 1783/CHENP/2012, was refused by the Controller of Patents as being obvious and lacking inventive step has been allowed by the Madras High Court (hereinafter “MHC”). The MHC directed narrowing of claims to clearly define the inventive feature and overcome refusal of Patent application due to lack of inventive step.
-
Mar 13, 2024 | 
lexology.com | Swati Sharma |Gitika Suri |Sandeep Pandey
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC’s (hereinafter “Microsoft”) appeal against an order dated September 29, 2020, by which its Indian Patent Application No. 1783/CHENP/2012, was refused by the Controller of Patents as being obvious and lacking inventive step has been allowed by the Madras High Court (hereinafter “MHC”). The MHC directed narrowing of claims to clearly define the inventive feature and overcome refusal of Patent application due to lack of inventive step.
