
Jacqueline Wootton
Articles
-
Sep 5, 2024 |
lexology.com | Christine Wong |Daniel R. Hyde |Jacqueline Wootton |Leon Chung
On 8 September 2024, the new offence of ‘failing to prevent ‘Associates’ bribing foreign public officials’ comes into effect. This is a strict liability corporate offence (see our website for an overview). There is an adequate procedures defence available to companies, in relation to which the Commonwealth Attorney General is required to publish guidance. The final Guidance on adequate procedures to prevent the commission of foreign bribery was published last week.
-
Jun 3, 2024 |
lexology.com | Timothy Stutt |Jacqueline Wootton |Olga Klimczak |Natalie Gaspar |Melanie Debenham
Today, ESG is near-ubiquitous across the Australian corporate landscape. As a lens on business decision-making, only 2% of companies surveyed in 2024 say they are not taking environment and social values into account when deciding investments. Further, 63% of companies confirm they have undertaken a formal ESG review in the last two years. Such reviews can take the form of focused, in-depth examinations by formal review committees of thematic risks and opportunities.
-
Jun 3, 2024 |
lexology.com | Timothy Stutt |Jacqueline Wootton
With opportunities, come challenges for businesses seeking to explore how to unlock value from prioritising and investing in understanding ‘S’ factors. Simply articulating an ESG-aligned purpose or commitment to specific ‘S’ goals is insufficient if not backed up by what employees and other stakeholders experience in practice. In fact, it is more likely to attract negative publicity, including criticisms of ‘social washing’, and lead to an erosion in employee engagement.
-
May 6, 2024 |
lexology.com | Leon Chung |Jacqueline Wootton |Christine Wong |Natasha Reurts |Priscilla Bourne |Kayla Laird
In a landmark case, the Federal Court of Australia has directly considered the scope of the Australian Autonomous Sanctions Regulations (2011) (Cth) (Regulations), marking the first instance where an Australian court has interpreted the prohibitions on sanctioned supplies (regulations 4 and 12) and dealings with designated persons and entities (regulation 14).
-
May 6, 2024 |
lexology.com | Leon Chung |Jacqueline Wootton |Christine Wong |Natasha Reurts |Priscilla Bourne |Kayla Laird
Recently, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in Tigers Realm Coal Limited v Commonwealth of Australia [2024] FCA 340, considering the interpretation of the word ‘transport’ in regulation 4A of the Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011 (Cth) (the Regulations). This decision marks yet another recent decision by the Federal Court of Australia regarding Australia’s autonomous sanctions regime.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →