Jeremy C. Marwell

Nov 5, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Jeremy C. Marwell |Ronald J. Tenpas |G. Zachary Terwilliger

This program is also available via webcast. With any new Presidential administration come questions about what will change in terms of policy and law—and how quickly.

Jul 10, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Sean Becker |Rebecca Fike |Jeremy C. Marwell

July 10, 2024 July 11th, 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm CT Sean Becker, Rebecca Fike, Jeremy Marwell, Kathy Pakenham, William Scherman, Ronald Tenpas Vinson & Elkins LLP + Follow x Following x Following - Unfollow Contact To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: July 11th, 2024 12:00 PM - 1:30 PM CT Join attorneys in our appellate, energy regulatory, environmental, tax, securities, and employment practices who will explore how these landmark rulings affect administrative law and...

May 30, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Nathan Campbell |Jason G. Fleischer |Jeremy C. Marwell

On May 1, 2024, the Council on Environmental Quality (“CEQ”) published the final version of Phase 2 of its National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) rulemaking (“Phase 2 Rule”).1 The Phase 2 Rule is the culmination of the Biden administration’s two-step rulemaking to unwind many of the Trump administration’s changes to the NEPA regulations and to apply the current administration’s approach to “simplify and modernize” the NEPA review process.

Dec 1, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Matthew Etchemendy |Jason G. Fleischer |Jeremy C. Marwell

On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a critically important administrative law case, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy, No. 22-859. This case carries enormous potential consequences for agencies beyond the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). As the parties and Justices discussed during the oral argument, numerous other federal agencies use in-house enforcement proceedings to seek civil penalties.

May 30, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Audrey Doane |John Geilman |Jeremy C. Marwell

On May 25, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in Sackett v. EPA,1 clarifying and narrowing the reach of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). For decades, confusion has persisted about the scope of the key phrase “navigable waters” under the CWA, defined vaguely to include “waters of the United States,” or “WOTUS.” Two tests had emerged from a fractured 2006 Supreme Court opinion in Rapanos v.