-
3 weeks ago | 
natlawreview.com | Jodi Benassi
Stephen Thaler, PhD, tried to apply for copyright registration for an art piece made by his own generative AI system. He was denied multiple times for "lack of human
-
Jan 10, 2025 | 
jdsupra.com | Jodi Benassi
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained that to be a derivative work, a program interoperative with another must actually incorporate aspects of the underlying work. The Court further ruled that licensees of a copy of a computer program are not “owners” of the copy and therefore are not entitled to make copies for the purposes permitted by 17 U.S.C. § 117(a). Oracle International Corp. v. Rimini Street, Inc., Case No. 23-16038 (9th Cir. Dec.
-
Jan 9, 2025 | 
natlawreview.com | Jodi Benassi
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explained that to be a derivative work, a program interoperative with another must actually incorporate aspects of the underlying work. The Court further ruled that licensees of a copy of a computer program are not “owners” of the copy and therefore are not entitled to make copies for the purposes permitted by 17 U.S.C. § 117(a). Oracle International Corp. v. Rimini Street, Inc., Case No. 23-16038 (9th Cir. Dec.
-
Jan 9, 2025 | 
natlawreview.com | Keval Amin |Eric Troutman |Jodi Benassi |Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Skip to main content January 09, 2025 Volume XV, Number 9 Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found. Trending News Holding Fourth: Insights from the Bench: A Conversation with Retired Fourth Circuit Judge Andre M.
-
Jan 9, 2025 | 
natlawreview.com | Keval Amin |Eric Troutman |Jodi Benassi |Joseph J. Lazzarotti
On December 11, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in a rare en banc decision vacated the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) order approving Nasdaq’s board diversity rules (Rules 5605(f) and Rule 5606).
-
Aug 24, 2023 | 
natlawreview.com | Jodi Benassi
Thursday, August 24, 2023 The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that there was no actionable infringement where an uncompleted building sold under the authority of a bankruptcy court was later completed. Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, LLC et al., Case No. 22-1976 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023) (Loken, Shepard, Kelly, JJ.) (per curiam).
-
Aug 24, 2023 | 
lexology.com | Jodi Benassi
The US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that there was no actionable infringement where an uncompleted building sold under the authority of a bankruptcy court was later completed. Cornice & Rose International, LLC v. Four Keys, LLC et al., Case No. 22-1976 (8th Cir. Aug. 11, 2023) (Loken, Shepard, Kelly, JJ.) (per curiam). The Court explained that the architectural copyright claims were precluded by the bankruptcy court’s order approving the sale.
-
Aug 17, 2023 | 
natlawreview.com | Jodi Benassi
Thursday, August 17, 2023 Adopting its interim rule from December 2022, the US Copyright Office issued a final rule that governs district court referrals, proof of service forms, default proceedings and the appearance of law student representatives before the Copyright Claims Board (CCB). CCB proceedings qualify as alternative dispute resolution processes under 28 U.S.C. § 651 for purposes of referral of eligible cases by US district courts upon consent of the parties.
-
Aug 17, 2023 | 
jdsupra.com | Jodi Benassi
Adopting its interim rule from December 2022, the US Copyright Office issued a final rule that governs district court referrals, proof of service forms, default proceedings and the appearance of law student representatives before the Copyright Claims Board (CCB). District Court ReferralsCCB proceedings qualify as alternative dispute resolution processes under 28 U.S.C. § 651 for purposes of referral of eligible cases by US district courts upon consent of the parties.
-
Aug 17, 2023 | 
lexology.com | Jodi Benassi
Adopting its interim rule from December 2022, the US Copyright Office issued a final rule that governs district court referrals, proof of service forms, default proceedings and the appearance of law student representatives before the Copyright Claims Board (CCB). District Court ReferralsCCB proceedings qualify as alternative dispute resolution processes under 28 U.S.C. § 651 for purposes of referral of eligible cases by US district courts upon consent of the parties.
