
Keval Amin
Articles
-
3 weeks ago |
natlawreview.com | Neil Shah |Sydney Juliano |Keval Amin
Skip to main content May 15, 2025 Volume XV, Number 135 Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.
-
Jan 14, 2025 |
mondaq.com | Keval Amin
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated andremanded a Patent Trial & Appeal Board decision, finding thatthe Board erred by failing to explain its holding and reasoningregarding a motivation to combine prior art references. PaloAlto Networks, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, LLC, Case No.23-1636 (Fed. Cir. Dec.
-
Jan 10, 2025 |
jdsupra.com | Keval Amin
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a Patent Trial & Appeal Board decision, finding that the Board erred by failing to explain its holding and reasoning regarding a motivation to combine prior art references. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, LLC, Case No. 23-1636 (Fed. Cir. Dec.
-
Jan 9, 2025 |
natlawreview.com | Loren Opper |Christie R. Galinski |Keval Amin |Eric Troutman
Taxpayers had mixed success in two recent research credit cases in the United States Tax Court. In Smith v. Commissioner,[1] the taxpayer was an architectural firm. The Tax Court denied the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment, allowing the case to proceed to trial on the issue of whether the taxpayer’s clients funded its research activities. In Phoenix Design Group, Inc. v. Commissioner,[2] disputed questions of fact proceeded to trial.
-
Jan 9, 2025 |
natlawreview.com | Keval Amin
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a Patent Trial & Appeal Board decision, finding that the Board erred by failing to explain its holding and reasoning regarding a motivation to combine prior art references. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Centripetal Networks, LLC, Case No. 23-1636 (Fed. Cir. Dec.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →