Articles
-
Jul 3, 2024 |
mdpi.com | Joshua Spencer
1. IntroductionAccording to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, someone is morally responsible for an action only if she could have done otherwise. More formally: (PAP) necessarily, for any person S and any action A, S is morally responsible for performing A only if there is some action A* such that S could have done A* while failing to do A. I, following Frankfurt [1] reject this principle. My argument against the principle involves the following time travel case [2] (p.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 1K
- Tweets
- 313
- DMs Open
- Yes
RT @TheEconomist: The fall of Saigon in 1975 triggered one of the world’s biggest diasporas. Fifty years on, Vietnamese emigrants and their…
RT @TheEconomist: Many Vietnamese emigrants are returning home to connect with their roots. It is not always an easy transition https://t.c…
RT @TheEconomist: Feuding dynasties, hit men, impeachment—and geopolitical tension. Just another day in Filipino politics, @_joshjs tells “…