Julie K. Stapel
Articles
-
Nov 12, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Matthew Russell |Julie K. Stapel
In 2017, several private universities were hit with ERISA class actions alleging various breaches of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions—including claims that these universities’ defined contribution plans charged unreasonable recordkeeping costs. One such university was Cornell in the case of Cunningham v. Cornell University.
-
Nov 12, 2024 |
morganlewis.com | Julie K. Stapel |Matthew Russell
In 2017, several private universities were hit with ERISA class actions alleging various breaches of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions—including claims that these universities’ defined contribution plans charged unreasonable recordkeeping costs. One such university was Cornell in the case of Cunningham v. Cornell University.
-
Sep 12, 2024 |
morganlewis.com | Julie K. Stapel
Lexis Practical Guidance published an article written by partner Julie Stapel discussing the impact of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. Department of Commerce on two US Department of Labor regulations, the “ESG Rule” and Retirement Security Rule, which are being challenged in federal court. Read the full Lexis Practical Guidance article >>
-
Sep 3, 2024 |
jdsupra.com | Julie K. Stapel
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v Department of Commerce, the Supreme Court held that both the United States’ constitutional structure and the Administrative Procedure Act preclude a court from deferring to administrative agencies when they interpret ambiguous statutory text. Instead, the court must assess the “best meaning” of the statute using traditional tools of statutory construction.
-
Aug 15, 2024 |
morganlewis.com | Julie K. Stapel
Bloomberg Law quoted partner Julie Stapel in an article about a case challenging the authority of the US Department of Labor (DOL) to promulgate its sustainable 401(k) investing regulation. The district court initially upheld the rule, but the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sent the case back to the district court to consider the impacts of the US Supreme Court’s decision overturning the Chevron doctrine, which gave deference to agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →