Michael Riffle

Jan 19, 2025 | nature.com | Brook L. Nunn |Emma Timmins-Schiffman |Gabriella Chebli |Julia Kubanek |Michael Riffle |Marcel Huntemann | +5 more

Correction to: Scientific Data https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04013-5, published online 22 November 2024In the version of this article initially published, two errors in authorship were made. First, Tatiana Rynearson of the School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island was mistakenly omitted from the final author list.

Nov 21, 2024 | nature.com | Brook L. Nunn |Emma Timmins-Schiffman |Julia Kubanek |Michael Riffle |Marcel Huntemann |Supratim Mukherjee | +5 more

AbstractIn May and June of 2021, marine microbial samples were collected for DNA sequencing in East Sound, WA, USA every 4 hours for 22 days. This high temporal resolution sampling effort captured the last 3 days of a Rhizosolenia sp. bloom, the initiation and complete bloom cycle of Chaetoceros socialis (8 days), and the following bacterial bloom (2 days).

Oct 20, 2024 | biorxiv.org | Jack Freestone |Michael Riffle |Michael J MacCoss |William Noble

AbstractA pressing statistical challenge in the field of mass spectrometry proteomics is how to assess whether a given software tool provides accurate error control. Each software tool for searching such data uses its own internally implemented methodology for reporting and controlling the error. Many of these software tools are closed source, with incompletely documented methodology, and the strategies for validating the error are inconsistent across tools.

Jun 4, 2024 | biorxiv.org | Jack Freestone |Michael J MacCoss |William Noble |Michael Riffle

AbstractA pressing statistical challenge in the field of mass spectrometry proteomics is how to assess whether a given software tool provides accurate error control. Each software tool for searching such data uses its own internally implemented methodology for reporting and controlling the error. Many of these software tools are closed source, with incompletely documented methodology, and the strategies for validating the error are inconsistent across tools.