Phil McGraw

2 weeks ago | dailymail.co.uk | Phil McGraw

Over the past several days, all manner of allegations have been made about legal and targeted federal immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles — and my apparent involvement in them. So many of these claims are untrue, provoking unnecessary distractions and more of the destructive rage that already pervades too much of our political dialogue. So allow me to set the record straight.

2 weeks ago | dailymail.co.uk | Phil McGraw

Just four weeks into the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs and I want to prepare you for the possibility that these proceedings could come to a sudden, screeching halt. I spent most of my professional career around courtrooms as a consultant for trial attorneys, instructing them, not on the legal aspects of cases, but on the human elements, specifically how jurors responded to their arguments.

1 month ago | usnews.com | Phil McGraw

The American experiment was built on many bold ideas – none more radical than this: that we have inalienable rights that come from God. Our founders foresaw that a power-hungry federal government would try to take those God-given rights from us, so they wrote protections against that into our founding documents. Chief among those were protections of religious liberty. Our founders didn’t view religion as a threat to liberty; they saw it as liberty’s guardian.

1 month ago | dailymail.co.uk | Phil McGraw

Opening statements have just begun in the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, yet the case against the multi-millionaire hip-hop superstar may already have been won… or lost. For it all comes down to the jury. From a pool of 150 potential jurors, the judge, defense team and federal prosecutors have selected 12 people (and six alternates should one of the active jurors become, for whatever reason, incapable of fulfilling their obligations). These few will be tasked with deciding Combs's fate.

1 month ago | nypost.com | Phil McGraw

The first words of the First Amendment to the US Constitution are: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”That’s pretty clear. We know what Congress is. We know what a law is. We know what religion is. But too often people have interpreted this to mean that government and religion must be completely separate — which was not the intention.