
Rachel Bogardus Drew
Articles
-
Oct 21, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Rachel Bogardus Drew |Emily Trompf
On 1 October 2024, the Australian Human Rights Commission Amendment (Costs Protection) Act 2024(the Act)amends both the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (AHRC Act) (and, consequentially, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 (FCFCA Act) and the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976(FCA Act)) following findings from a national inquiry into workplace sexual harassment.
-
Oct 3, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Rachel Bogardus Drew |Emily Trompf |Sophie Wyatt
On 10 September 2024, the Queensland Government passed the Respect at Work and Other Matters Amendment Bill 2024 (Qld) (the Bill). The Bill followed the findings of the Respect@Work: National Inquiry into Sexual Harassment in Australian Workplaces Report and the Building Belonging – Review of Queensland's Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 which found serious gaps between public understanding and the available protections.
-
Aug 14, 2024 |
hcamag.com | Rachel Bogardus Drew |Rose Dimitrious |Kelvin Lee
Australian Privacy Principles govern use of personal employee information, but have exemptions In general, an employer has a right to monitor an employee’s use of company property (e.g. a work computer), but there are limits to this right. Laws that relate to monitoring and surveillance vary across Australian states and territories and can be very complex. This article considers the case of Madzikanda v.
-
May 22, 2024 |
hcamag.com | Rachel Bogardus Drew |David Chambers |Maud Beach
Decision not to offer new contract after series of rolling contracts was termination In the recent decision of Warren George Francis v. Volunteer Marine Rescue Assoc Qld Inc [2024] FWC 978, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has held that providing early notice of non-renewal for a fixed-term contract can constitute dismissal.
-
May 8, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Rachel Bogardus Drew |Kelvin Lee |Rose Dimitrious
In general, an employer has a right to monitor an employee's use of company property (e.g. a work computer), but there are limits to this right. Laws that relate to monitoring and surveillance vary across Australian states and territories and can be very complex. This article considers the case of Madzikanda v Australian Information Commissioner [2023] FCA 1445, which examines whether monitoring an employee's use of company property breaches the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Act).
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →