
Rachel E. Hudgins
Contributor at Freelance
Articles
-
1 month ago |
hunton.com | Syed S. Ahmad |Rachel E. Hudgins |Evan Warshauer |Courtney Bynum Crittenden
In April 2025, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a judgment against a Florida lodge and held that a jury should determine whether the failure of the lodge’s insurer to initiate settlement proceedings before a claim was filed constituted bad faith.
-
2 months ago |
businesslawtoday.org | Rachel E. Hudgins |Scott P. DeVries |Andrew S. Koelz
For policyholders, insurance is meant to provide peace of mind—a promise that when disaster strikes, they’ll have financial support to rebuild and recover. But as two recent cases show, the question of what qualifies as covered “direct physical loss or damage” can lead to drastically different outcomes in court. In two recent California cases, policyholders sought coverage after wildfire smoke and debris affected their properties. One court, in Bottega, LLC v.
-
2 months ago |
americanbar.org | Rachel E. Hudgins |Scott P. DeVries
Recent California cases show how courts differ on whether smoke contamination qualifies as “direct physical loss,” with one ruling for the policyholder (Bottega) and another for the insurer (Gharibian). Explicit smoke damage coverage can simplify claims, while strong evidence, such as expert testimony on contamination effects, can assist in proving a loss. Insurers may challenge smoke-related claims, arguing damage is superficial and transient.
-
Mar 20, 2025 |
natlawreview.com | Rachel E. Hudgins
NCAA March Madness tournaments are among the most anticipated and exciting events in American sports, drawing millions of viewers and generating significant economic activity. But the massive popularity of the tournaments comes with risks that can affect participants, venues, sponsors, and fans.
-
Feb 13, 2025 |
natlawreview.com | Rachel E. Hudgins
For policyholders, insurance is meant to provide peace of mind—a promise that when disaster strikes, they’ll have financial support to rebuild and recover. But as two recent cases show, the question of what qualifies as covered “direct physical loss or damage” can lead to drastically different outcomes in court. In two recent California cases, both policyholders sought coverage after wildfire smoke and debris affected their properties. One court ruled in favor of coverage. Bottega, LLC v.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →