Sana Halwani

Featured in: Favicon

theglobeandmail.com Favicon

mondaq.com Favicon

lawandstyle.ca

Articles

29th Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review

Jan 6, 2025 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani

January 17, 2025 29th Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review Sana Halwani was invited to share her expertise at the Law Society of Ontario's 29th Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review. Sana will present on the session titled, Artificial Intelligence: Substantive Legal Developments in Copyright Claims.
Actions, Applications and Hybrid Proceedings: Considerations and Strategies for IP Lawyers

Nov 19, 2024 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani

December 5, 2024 Actions, Applications and Hybrid Proceedings: Considerations and Strategies for IP Lawyers Sana Halwani was invited to speak as a panelist at the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada program titled, Actions, Applications and Hybrid Proceedings: Considerations and Strategies for IP Lawyers.
Lenczner Slaght Recognized as a Leading Litigation Firm in Legal 500 Canada

Nov 12, 2024 | litigate.com | Brian Kolenda |Andrew Moeser |Sana Halwani |Matthew Lerner

Canada’s leading litigation firm has reaffirmed its Tier 1 ranking in Dispute Resolution in Legal 500 Canada. Based on in-depth research, client feedback, and interviews with leading lawyers in the industry, Lenczner Slaght also continues to be recognized for its litigation excellence in Construction, Insurance, Intellectual Property, and Restructuring and Insolvency. Dispute ResolutionHall of Fame Tom Curry Peter GriffinLeading Partners Matthew B.
Lenczner Slaght Litigators Recognized as Leading Practitioners in IP

Jun 28, 2024 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani |Jordana Sanft

The latest edition of Managing Intellectual Property’s 2024 IP STARS handbook, a leading guide to the world’s foremost IP firms and practitioners, continues to recognize Sana Halwani and Jordana Sanft. After extensive surveys and interviews with top firms, IP agencies, individual practitioners and clients, our expert IP litigators, Sana and Jordana, continue to be recognized as both Patent and Trademark Stars.
AI Here, AI There, AI Everywhere: Practical Challenges Litigating in an AI World

Jun 24, 2024 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani |Meghan Bridges

In the final instalment of our AI in the Courtroom series, we explore practical challenges that may arise when litigating in an AI world, and within the current framework of the Rules of Civil Procedure, Practice Directions, and common law. While the law is not entirely unequipped to deal with these challenges, evolution in the Rules and common law will likely be necessary as AI becomes more commonly used by various participants in the litigation process. 1.
AI Competence in the Courtroom: Four Things Judges Need to Understand Now About AI

May 22, 2024 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani |Jonathan Chen

As artificial intelligence continues to permeate every aspect of our lives, legal challenges involving AI will proliferate. Parts 1 to 3 in our series explored many of these potential questions. AI will create new legal problems and change the texture of old ones. As always, the judiciary, with the assistance of counsel, will assume a pivotal role in navigating this landscape.
Exploring The Boundaries Of Patent Protection: Federal Court Of Appeal Holds That Marketing Is Not

May 7, 2024 | mondaq.com | Sana Halwani |Jordana Sanft |Andrew Moeser

The Federal Court of Appeal's decision in Steelhead v ARC upholds Justice Manson's summary trial decision finding no infringement by ARC Resources of Steelhead's 085 Patent. In summary, the FCA held that the marketing of an apparatus that – if built – would infringe the 085 Patent did not constitute "use" (or "exploiter" in the French version) under of the Patent Act, and therefore could not be infringement.
Exploring the Boundaries of Patent Protection: Federal Court of Appeal Holds That Marketing Is Not “Use” Under the Patent Act

Apr 29, 2024 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani |Jordana Sanft |Andrew Moeser

The Federal Court of Appeal’s decision in Steelhead v ARC upholds Justice Manson’s summary trial decision finding no infringement by ARC Resources of Steelhead’s 085 Patent. In summary, the FCA held that the marketing of an apparatus that – if built – would infringe the 085 Patent did not constitute “use” (or “exploiter” in the French version) under of the Patent Act, and therefore could not be infringement.
When Is A Gap Not A Gap? Court Maintains Procedural Differences Between Actions And Applications

Apr 23, 2024 | mondaq.com | Sana Halwani

In two decisions released on the same day, the Federal Court has confirmed that applications are summary procedures that exclude the right or ability to examine witnesses who have not sworn affidavits.
Expert Witnesses and Persuasive Testimony in Technology Cases: Leveraging Technical Evidence

Apr 18, 2024 | litigate.com | Sana Halwani

Sana Halwani was invited to present at the Canadian Bar Association program titled, Expert Witnesses and Persuasive Testimony in Technology Cases: Leveraging Technical Evidence. Sana will discuss the critical role of expert witnesses in technology litigation, providing best practices for selecting, preparing, and presenting them effectively. She will also cover strategies for handling cross-examination and engage in interactive discussions on recent cases involving technological testimony.

Contact details

Emails

[email protected]

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →

Sana Halwani

Articles

29th Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review

Actions, Applications and Hybrid Proceedings: Considerations and Strategies for IP Lawyers

Lenczner Slaght Recognized as a Leading Litigation Firm in Legal 500 Canada

Lenczner Slaght Litigators Recognized as Leading Practitioners in IP

AI Here, AI There, AI Everywhere: Practical Challenges Litigating in an AI World

AI Competence in the Courtroom: Four Things Judges Need to Understand Now About AI

Exploring The Boundaries Of Patent Protection: Federal Court Of Appeal Holds That Marketing Is Not

Exploring the Boundaries of Patent Protection: Federal Court of Appeal Holds That Marketing Is Not “Use” Under the Patent Act

When Is A Gap Not A Gap? Court Maintains Procedural Differences Between Actions And Applications

Expert Witnesses and Persuasive Testimony in Technology Cases: Leveraging Technical Evidence

Contact details

Emails

Socials & Sites