Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks

Featured in: Favicon

law360.com Favicon

jdsupra.com Favicon

natlawreview.com Favicon

lexology.com Favicon

mondaq.com Favicon

lexblog.com

Articles

Supreme Court Holds That Copyright Damages Have No Time Limit

May 16, 2024 | mondaq.com | Isaiah D. Anderson |David Munkittrick |Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks |Craig B. Whitney

Under the Copyright Act, "there is no time limit on monetary recovery" for a timely claim. So held the Supreme Court last week in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy. Section 507 of the Copyright Act imposes a three-year statute of limitations: "No civil action shall be maintained ...
Supreme Court Holds that Copyright Damages Have No Time Limit | JD Supra

May 14, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks |David Munkittrick |Craig B. Whitney

Under the Copyright Act, “there is no time limit on monetary recovery” for a timely claim. So held the Supreme Court last week in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy.
Supreme Court Holds that Copyright Damages Have No Time Limit

May 13, 2024 | natlawreview.com | Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks

Under the Copyright Act, “there is no time limit on monetary recovery” for a timely claim. So held the Supreme Court last week in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy.
Un

Jan 18, 2024 | mondaq.com | Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate |David Munkittrick |Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks

Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California recently dismissed toy manufacturer Tangle's copyright and trade dress suit against fashion retailer Aritzia. The suit was brought over Aritzia's use of sculptures resembling Tangle's toys in its window displays.
Un“Tangled”: Judge Dismisses Tangle’s Window Display IP Suit Against Aritzia

Dec 6, 2023 | lexology.com | Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate |David Munkittrick |Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks

Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District of California recently dismissed toy manufacturer Tangle’s copyright and trade dress suit against fashion retailer Aritzia. The suit was brought over Aritzia’s use of sculptures resembling Tangle’s toys in its window displays.
Supreme Court Affirms Andy Warhol's Prince Series Not Transformative Fair Use

Jun 15, 2023 | mondaq.com | Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks |David Munkittrick |Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate |Nicole Sockett

On May 18th, the Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith. We've tracked the progress of this case through the trial court, Second Circuit, and Supreme Court. The case concerns whether the Andy Warhol Foundation violated a copyright held by photographer Lynn Goldsmith when it licensed a Warhol work called Orange Prince, based on Goldsmith's photo, to Condé Nast for use on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine.
Supreme Court Affirms Andy Warhol’s Prince Series Not Transformative Fair Use | JD Supra

Jun 14, 2023 | jdsupra.com | Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks |David Munkittrick |Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate

On May 18th, the Supreme Court handed down its much‑anticipated opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith. We’ve tracked the progress of this case through the trial court, Second Circuit, and Supreme Court. The case concerns whether the Andy Warhol Foundation violated a copyright held by photographer Lynn Goldsmith when it licensed a Warhol work called Orange Prince, based on Goldsmith’s photo, to Condé Nast for use on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine.