Nicole Sockett

2 months ago | mondaq.com | Steven J Pearlman |Nicole Sockett

On December 3, 2024, a U.S District Court for the District ofMassachusetts jury awarded Plaintiff Insulet Corporation $452million in compensatory and punitive damages after findingDefendants willfully misappropriated Insulet's trade secrets. Insulet Corp. v. EOFlow Co. Ltd., et al., Case No.1:23-cv-11780 (D. Mass.)Insulet is a manufacturer of tubeless insulin pump patches withits Omnipod brand of products. Insulet Omnipod products have beenFDA approved since 2005.

Jan 23, 2025 | jdsupra.com | Steven J Pearlman |Nicole Sockett

On December 3, 2024, a U.S District Court for the District of Massachusetts jury awarded Plaintiff Insulet Corporation $452 million in compensatory and punitive damages after finding Defendants willfully misappropriated Insulet’s trade secrets. Insulet Corp. v. EOFlow Co. Ltd., et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-11780 (D. Mass.)Insulet is a manufacturer of tubeless insulin pump patches with its Omnipod brand of products. Insulet Omnipod products have been FDA approved since 2005.

Jul 29, 2024 | jdsupra.com | Michael Beckwith |Jessica Griffith |Nicole Sockett

As chemicals of concern litigation continues to surge across the nation, companies increasingly find their products under scrutiny for alleged contamination of these “forever chemicals.”  These “forever chemicals” have become a focal point for environmental and consumer protection lawsuits, as plaintiffs’ attorneys increasingly target companies to leverage the frequent media attention surrounding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) chemicals.

Jul 29, 2024 | lexology.com | Baldassare Vinti |Jessica Griffith |Nicole Sockett |Michael Beckwith

As chemicals of concern litigation continues to surge across the nation, companies increasingly find their products under scrutiny for alleged contamination of these “forever chemicals.” These “forever chemicals” have become a focal point for environmental and consumer protection lawsuits, as plaintiffs’ attorneys increasingly target companies to leverage the frequent media attention surrounding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) chemicals.

Jun 15, 2023 | mondaq.com | Sandra Crawshaw-Sparks |David Munkittrick |Anisha Shenai-Khatkhate |Nicole Sockett

On May 18th, the Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith. We've tracked the progress of this case through the trial court, Second Circuit, and Supreme Court. The case concerns whether the Andy Warhol Foundation violated a copyright held by photographer Lynn Goldsmith when it licensed a Warhol work called Orange Prince, based on Goldsmith's photo, to Condé Nast for use on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine.