
Shlomo Hahn
Articles
-
Sep 12, 2024 |
lathropgpm.com | Craig J. Knobbe |Brandon Mickelsen |Allyson Cunningham |Shlomo Hahn
A federal court in Michigan has granted a franchisor’s motion for preliminary injunction against former franchisees for violating the franchise agreements’ post-termination noncompete provisions. 1-800 Water Damage Int’l LLC v. Restoration RX, LLC, 2024 WL 3623508 (July 31, 2024).
-
Sep 12, 2024 |
lathropgpm.com | Michael Sturm |Emma Halling |Allyson Cunningham |Shlomo Hahn
A federal court in Michigan recently granted several related franchisors’ motions to dismiss a franchisee’s claims for violations of the Michigan Franchise Investment law. Benjamin Franklin Franchising SPE LLC v. David Michael Plumbing Inc., 2024 WL 3997056 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 29, 2024). The franchisors (including Benjamin Franklin Franchising, One Hour Air Conditioning Franchising, and Mister Sparky Franchising) alleged their franchisee David Michael Plumbing Inc.
-
Aug 8, 2024 |
lathropgpm.com | Craig Miller |Cassie Doutt |Allyson Cunningham |Shlomo Hahn
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a district court’s dismissal of two claims brought by distributors against the medical-device manufacturer Zimmer Biomet. It also affirmed a jury verdict in favor of the distributors on their breach of contract claim under Indiana law. Hess v. Biomet, Inc., 105 F.4th 912 (7th Cir. 2024).
-
Aug 8, 2024 |
lathropgpm.com | Michael Gray |Emma Halling |Allyson Cunningham |Shlomo Hahn
A federal court in Wisconsin recently denied a haircare product dealer’s motion for summary judgment on its Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL) and breach of contract claims against the dealer’s national distributor. Brava Salon Specialists, LLC v. REF N. Am., Inc., 2024 WL 3443799 (W.D. Wis. July 16, 2024). Brava Salon Specialists is a Wisconsin-based dealer of haircare products manufactured and distributed by REF North America.
-
Jul 3, 2024 |
lathropgpm.com | Sandra Yaeger Bodeau |Natalie Kay |Allyson Cunningham |Shlomo Hahn
A federal court in New York recently ruled that an interim arbitration order was final and granted a developer’s petition to confirm the order which required the franchisor to make payments to the developer while the arbitration was ongoing. Subway Franchise Sys. of Canada, ULC v. Subway Devs. 2000, Inc., 2024 WL 3090480 (S.D.N.Y. June 21, 2024).
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →