
Tyler S. Laughinghouse
Articles
-
Nov 4, 2024 |
finance.yahoo.com | Robert T. Quackenboss |Tyler S. Laughinghouse
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. Robert Quackenboss is a partner at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. Tyler Laughinghouse is an associate at the firm. On Nov. 5, the U.S. Supreme Court will take up a wage and hour case, E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v.
-
Sep 30, 2024 |
lexology.com | Kurt G. Larkin |Tyler S. Laughinghouse
On August 22, 2024, the Board ended its 50-year history of allowing consent orders in unfair labor practice cases. In Metro Health Inc. d/b/a Hospital Metropolitano Rio San Pedras, the Board held that: “in all pending and future unfair labor practice cases, the Board will not terminate the case by accepting or approving a consent order.”The Board’s decision marks a reversal of 50 years of precedent.
-
Jul 3, 2024 |
lexology.com | Robert T. Quackenboss |Tyler S. Laughinghouse
On June 17, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to take up a wage and hour case, E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera, to address a circuit split regarding the standard of proof that employers must satisfy to show that employees are exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).
-
Apr 25, 2024 |
lexology.com | Austin Maloney |Jordan G. Sisco |Ryan Glasgow |Kevin Hahm |Tyler S. Laughinghouse
Background On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) published a proposed rule (the “Proposed Rule”) that would have had the effect of banning nearly all employee non-competes throughout the United States and invalidate all such existing agreements subject to a few exceptions.[1] We wrote about the Proposed Rule at the time of publication and are providing an update on the Final Rule that was released by the FTC on April 23, 2024 (the “Final Rule”) after a lengthy review and...
-
Mar 26, 2024 |
lexblog.com | Ryan Glasgow |Tyler S. Laughinghouse
On March 12, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed two separate district court decisions addressing how pizza delivery drivers should be reimbursed for their vehicle-related expenses under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The underlying cases involved minimum wage claims under the FLSA.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →