William Azuh's profile photo

Articles

  • Aug 14, 2024 | lexology.com | William Azuh |Verity Buckingham |Laura Jackson |Leslie M. Martin |Helena Rozman

    As part of our summer 2024 employment trends series, we share our observations on developments in relation to restrictive covenants, both in the UK and further afield. In the UK, we have not seen any new statutory developments on restrictive covenants following the previous government’s response to its consultation on post-termination non-compete clauses.

  • Jun 19, 2024 | lexology.com | William Azuh

    Last month, the High Court (the Court) granted interim injunctions preventing a former employee from soliciting or dealing with his former employer’s customers after the company found out that he had engaged with at least 26 of their customers in breach of the restrictive covenants in his employment contract. BackgroundIn Morgan Fire Protection Limited v.

  • Apr 16, 2024 | lexology.com | William Azuh

    A recent ruling by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the EAT) in the case of Matthews v. CGI IT UK Ltd highlights a rare exception to the idea that an employer must carry out all the usual procedures for a dismissal to be fair. It demonstrated that in certain exceptional circumstances, an employer may fairly terminate an employee’s contract without issuing a formal written warning or providing a right to appeal.

  • Jan 10, 2024 | lexology.com | Michelle Lamb |William Azuh

    New family-friendly legislation is set to come into force this year. There will be changes to flexible working, carer’s leave, maternity, adoption and shared parental leave. The new laws are explained below. Flexible Working (Amendment) Regulations 2023From 6 April 2024, the right to request flexible working will be granted to employees from their first day of service. This contrasts with the current requirement for 26 weeks’ continuous employment before an employee can make such a request.

  • Oct 31, 2023 | lexology.com | William Azuh

    The High Court recently considered whether a bonus clawback provision in an employment contract amounted to an unreasonable restraint of trade, so making it unenforceable. In this instance, the employer could require repayment if the employee gave or received notice to terminate his employment within three months of the payment of a bonus. In Steel v. Spencer Road LLP (t/a The Omerta Group) [2023], Mr Steel received a bonus in January 2022 under a discretionary scheme.

Contact details

Socials & Sites

Try JournoFinder For Free

Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.

Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →