-
3 weeks ago | 
creation.com | Jonathan Sarfati |Andrew S Kulikovsky |Carl Wieland
Hugh Ross’s blunders on plant death in the Bible Creation/Fall/Redemptionen.wikipedia.org Dr Hugh Ross is well known for adding billions of years to the Bible, claiming that the creation days were long ages. His view is often called progressive creationism. However, biblical creationists have long pointed out a major problem for this view—that the Bible teaches that death came through sin.
-
Jan 9, 2025 | 
hermeneutics.kulikovskyonline.net | Andrew S Kulikovsky
A Summary of Evidence
for Literal 24-hr Creation Days
in Genesis 1. by Andrew S. Kulikovsky B.App.Sc(Hons) MA (candidate). You are visitor
The following is a summary of the major BIBLICAL data which clearly
shows that the days of creation in Genesis 1 are literal 24-hr days. It
is by no means exhaustive, since such a presentation would fill an entire
book (I am writing one at the moment!).
-
Nov 28, 2024 | 
creation.com | Shaun Doyle |Kenneth L Gentry |Andrew S Kulikovsky |Jonathan Sarfati
This article is from Journal of Creation 37(1):55–58, April 2023 The Framework Hypothesis posits that the structure of Genesis1 is evidence that its depiction of God’s creative work is non-historical: “The Framework Interpretation of Genesis 1:1–2:3 is the view which maintains that, while the six days of creation are normal solar days, the total picture of God’s completing His creative work in a week of days is not to be taken literally, but functions as a literary framework for the creation...
-
Oct 15, 2024 | 
creation.com | Jonathan Sarfati |Andrew S Kulikovsky
This article is from Creation 45(4):24–26, October 2023 Adapted from chapter 1 of the author’s The Genesis Account, a classic commentary on the Bible’s first 11 chapters.
-
Oct 2, 2024 | 
creation.com | Lita Cosner Sanders |Jonathan Sarfati |Andrew S Kulikovsky
This article is from Creation 36(4):49–51, October 2014 This is the pre-publication version which was subsequently revised to appear in Creation 36(4):49–51. 123rf.com/Illia UriadnikovWhen professing Christians deny biblical creation, we often point them to the words of Jesus and the New Testament authors which clearly affirm belief in biblical creation.
-
May 3, 2024 | 
creation.com | Bill Muehlenberg |Andrew S Kulikovsky |Drs Steve Kumar |Jonathan Sarfati
Chillingly consistent application of evolutionPhoto courtesy sxc.hu Who says ideas do not have consequences? Ideas are not just neutral, ethereal concepts with no bearing on life. Quite the contrary. Bad ideas have bad consequences. And good ideas have good consequences. One very bad idea which leads to some very nasty consequences is materialistic reductionism. This is the idea that only matter matters.
-
Feb 21, 2024 | 
creation.com | Philip Bell |Andrew S Kulikovsky |Jonathan Sarfati
Feedback archive → Feedback 2024Is original sin unjust? Photo 17024448 | Rotten Apple © Dmitrijs Gerciks | Dreamstime.comThe doctrine of original sin causes some to bristle. Brent A. from Canada asked how it squares with the moral principle of individual responsibility spelled out in Ezekiel 18. Keaton Halley of CMI–US offers some thoughts on the subject below, and defends original sin as biblically faithful and morally just.
-
Nov 30, 2023 | 
creation.com | Andrew Sibley |Jonathan Sarfati |Andrew S Kulikovsky
This article is from Journal of Creation 36(3):123–128, December 2022 Photo 54128375 © Neil Letson | Dreamstime.comThe influence of John Nelson Darby (1800–1882), and the Scofield Reference Bible (1909, 1917), led many members of the Plymouth Brethren movement to adopt belief in old-earth creation, as opposed to young-earth creation, or theistic evolution.
-
Oct 17, 2023 | 
creation.com | Andrew S Kulikovsky
This article is from Journal of Creation 13(2):61–62, November 1999 Summary The ‘rest’ mentioned in Hebrews 4:1–11 has been used by a number of ‘progressive’ creationists1,2as ‘evidence’ that the Bible can be reconciled with the billions of years postulated by evolutionists/uniformitarians. Because this passage includes a quotation from Genesis 2:2, God’s rest has been equated with the seventh day of creation.
-
Oct 13, 2023 | 
creation.com | Andrew S Kulikovsky |Lita Cosner |Jonathan Sarfati
Feedback archive → Feedback 2011This feedback concerns the ‘gap theory’, which tends to rely on a misunderstanding of the word ‘replenish’ in the King James Version of Genesis 1:28, which originally meant ‘fill’. Ray K. from New Zealand wrote in, with responses from CMI’s Dr Jonathan Sarfati and Lita Sanders interspersed:©CMIDear Mr K.,We’ve been asked to respond on behalf of Dr Wieland and the editors.
