Arvind Gunasekar

“Plead guilty for a lesser sentence”

The White House @WhiteHouse

DO NOT RETALIATE AND YOU WILL BE REWARDED

Why hasn’t the SC uploaded this judgment on its website yet ?!

Arvind Gunasekar @arvindgunasekar

In a landmark judgment, SC has fixed timeline for Governors to decide on the Bills passed by the Assemblies and files sent by the elected Governments for his/her consideration. SC has firmly held that Governors are just the Constitutional heads and should respect the will of the

On the complaint of @amazonIN, CBI registers case to probe alleged sale of fake one touch glucose test strips and lancets on its platform.

After Madhabi Buch saga, SEBI constitutes High Level Committee on Conflict of Interest, Disclosures and related matters in respect of SEBI Members and Officials.

RT @PTI_News: We will demolish the wall that is restricting reservation to 50 per cent for SC, ST, OBC: Rahul Gandhi at AICC session

Congratulations Mitali :)

Reuters Institute @risj_oxford

We are thrilled to announce that Mitali Mukherjee has been named Director of the Reuters Institute. Mukherjee, who has been Acting Director since October, was selected in an open process that concluded in late March Our announcement https://t.co/AhXFmn1255 Details in thread https://t.co/bsNyj2uA5r

Governor RN Ravi would do well to resign: Mukul Rohatgi, former Attorney General of India.

IndiaToday @IndiaToday

''This was the case of continued obstinacy and inaction of the governor. The governor would do well to resign '': Former Attorney General, Mukul Rohatgi #NewsToday @SardesaiRajdeep https://t.co/P4SxE3uN9s

SC Constitution Bench in its judgment dated 2002 has held that a Presidential Reference cannot be adopted as a means to review or appeal the judgment of the Supreme Court. So, if at all Centre is unhappy with Governor case judgment, Review Petition is the only option, not

Evil @EvilasHell69

@arvindgunasekar @_sabanaqvi and @Nidhi are about to find out the meaning of a review, and the President of India. And cry!

Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 comes into effect from today (8.4.2025). https://t.co/uzEGOQyMXO

Arvind Gunasekar @arvindgunasekar

President gives her assent to Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

Remember, then President Abdul Kalam wanted to resign after SC quashed imposition of President’s rule in Bihar in 2005. Kalam signed his resignation and was waiting to give it to Veep, then PM Manmohan Singh “pleaded” him to withdraw his decision. https://t.co/2KfrheYJc9

In a landmark judgment, SC has fixed timeline for Governors to decide on the Bills passed by the Assemblies and files sent by the elected Governments for his/her consideration. SC has firmly held that Governors are just the Constitutional heads and should respect the will of the

Kalaignar set up Rajamannar Committee in 1969 to strengthen Federalism, committee recommended “Governor should act as a constitutional head, not an agent of the center.” MK Stalin as CM of Tamil Nadu in 2025 has secured a judgement from SC on the same, “𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐨𝐫

SC frames timeline for Governors to decide on Bills passed by the Assemblies: Governors should decide on referring Bills to President as per the advice of the Council of Ministers within one month. Governors should decide on withholding assent on Bill passed by the Assemblies

SC rules action of Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi referring 10 Bills passed by the Assembly to President as “illegal”.

SC to pronounce judgment shortly on the pleas by Tamil Nadu Government against Governor RN Ravi for delaying assent on Bills passed by the Assembly.

Arvind Gunasekar @arvindgunasekar

On the plea by Tamil Nadu Government against Governor RN Ravi for delaying assent on Bills, SC hints at fixing timeframe for Governors in deciding on Bills similar to earlier judgement by the apex court fixing timeframe for Speaker in deciding disqualification pleas.