
Bruce Douglas
Articles
-
1 week ago |
mondaq.com | Bruce Douglas |Colin H. Hargreaves |Zachary Zagger
Quick HitsThe U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled infavor of a natural gas distribution company that discharged anemployee who failed a random drug test. The court found that federal laws, including the Natural GasPipeline Safety Act, the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Safety Act, andDOT drug and alcohol testing regulations preempted DATWA'semployment protections regarding drug testing.
-
2 weeks ago |
ogletree.com | Bruce Douglas |Colin H. Hargreaves |Zachary Zagger
Quick HitsThe U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota ruled in favor of a natural gas distribution company that discharged an employee who failed a random drug test. The court found that federal laws, including the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act, the Hazardous Liquids Pipeline Safety Act, and DOT drug and alcohol testing regulations preempted DATWA’s employment protections regarding drug testing.
-
2 months ago |
jdsupra.com | Bruce Douglas |Maria B. Shatonova |Zachary Zagger
On April 2, 2025, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that a truck driver who lost his job after testing positive for marijuana may pursue claims for lost wages under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) against the sellers of an allegedly fraudulently marketed pain relief product.
-
2 months ago |
ogletree.com | Bruce Douglas |Maria B. Shatonova |Zachary Zagger
Quick HitsThe Supreme Court allowed a truck driver to pursue civil RICO claims for lost wages after he failed an employer drug test after ingesting an allegedly falsely marketed pain relief product. The Court ruled that a plaintiff may pursue treble damages under RICO for lost business or property that followed a personal injury. The decision raises questions about the scope of RICO, particularly whether lost wages and economic harms related to personal injuries can be considered recoverable.
-
Oct 2, 2024 |
natlawreview.com | Bruce Douglas
With Election Day approaching, here is a timely reminder for employers in Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota, and North Dakota regarding their obligations under these states’ laws to excuse employees from work to go to the polls. With many voters opting to vote early or by mail, the number of voters going to the polls in person on Election Day may be smaller than in the past, but here are the points employers need to know regarding the rules for voting in person on Election Day.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →