-
3 weeks ago | 
mondaq.com | Neil Shah |Anastasia Gellman
A multiemployer plan that prevails in an action to collectdelinquent contributions or withdrawal liability is statutorilyentitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs"of the action." In International Painters &Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Florida Glass of Tampa Bay,Inc., No. 23-cv-00045, 2025 WL 712965 (D. Md. Mar.
-
3 weeks ago | 
jdsupra.com | Anastasia Gellman |Neil Shah
A multiemployer plan that prevails in an action to collect delinquent contributions or withdrawal liability is statutorily entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs “of the action.” In International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc., No. 23-cv-00045, 2025 WL 712965 (D. Md. Mar.
-
3 weeks ago | 
openlegalblogarchive.org | Neil Shah |Anastasia Gellman
A multiemployer plan that prevails in an action to collect delinquent contributions or withdrawal liability is statutorily entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs “of the action.” In International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc., No. 23-cv-00045, 2025 WL 712965 (D. Md. Mar.
-
3 weeks ago | 
natlawreview.com | Alec Nealon |Nikki Dobay |Katy Stone |Neil Shah
Skip to main content June 02, 2025 Volume XV, Number 153 Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.
-
3 weeks ago | 
natlawreview.com | Neil Shah
A multiemployer plan that prevails in an action to collect delinquent contributions or withdrawal liability is statutorily entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs “of the action.” In International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. Florida Glass of Tampa Bay, Inc., No. 23-cv-00045, 2025 WL 712965 (D. Md. Mar.
-
1 month ago | 
mondaq.com | Neil Shah |Sydney Juliano
A federal district court in Illinois became the first court torule that an employer's credit for a prior partial withdrawalshould be applied at the end of the statute's"waterfall" for calculating withdrawal liability. Thecase is Consumers Concrete Corp. v. Central States, S.E. andS.W. Areas Pension Fund, Nos. 23-cv-2695 & 23-cv-3005,2025 WL 1001799 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 2025).
-
1 month ago | 
natlawreview.com | Neil Shah
A federal district court in Illinois became the first court to rule that an employer’s credit for a prior partial withdrawal should be applied at the end of the statute’s “waterfall” for calculating withdrawal liability. The case is Consumers Concrete Corp. v. Central States, S.E. and S.W. Areas Pension Fund, Nos. 23-cv-2695 & 23-cv-3005, 2025 WL 1001799 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 3, 2025).
-
1 month ago | 
natlawreview.com | Neil Shah |Sydney Juliano |Keval Amin
Skip to main content May 15, 2025 Volume XV, Number 135 Legal Analysis. Expertly Written. Quickly Found.
-
1 month ago | 
mondaq.com | Justin Alex |Neil Shah
We recently reported on a district court decision holding that theCentral States Pension Fund's calculation of withdrawalliability should not have included contribution rate increasesimposed after the Fund's implementation of a rehabilitationplan. In Central States, S.E. & S.W. Pension Fund v. EventMedia Inc., Nos. 24-1739 & 1740-42, 2025 WL 1185368 (7thCir. Apr. 24, 2025), the Seventh Circuit affirmed two priordistrict court rulings that had reached the same conclusion.
-
1 month ago | 
jdsupra.com | Justin Alex |Neil Shah
We recently reported on a district court decision holding that the Central States Pension Fund’s calculation of withdrawal liability should not have included contribution rate increases imposed after the Fund’s implementation of a rehabilitation plan. In Central States, S.E. & S.W. Pension Fund v. Event Media Inc., Nos. 24-1739 & 1740-42, 2025 WL 1185368 (7th Cir. Apr. 24, 2025), the Seventh Circuit affirmed two prior district court rulings that had reached the same conclusion.
