
Maged Girgis
Articles
-
Sep 13, 2024 |
fssuper.com.au | Michael Vrisakis |Maged Girgis |Andrew Bradley |Tamanna Islam |Hartley Spring
This paper explores and seeks to demystify intrafund advice (IFA) and to provide well-needed legal illumination. It does so by identifying the key legal building blocks that need to be considered to properly understand intra-fund advice. ASIC guidanceThere is not a plethora of guidance around the nature and parameters of intra-fund advice.
-
Jul 5, 2024 |
lexology.com | Michael Vrisakis |Maged Girgis |Andrew Bradley |Hartley Spring |Isabel Chong
On 4 July 2024, Treasury agreed to make further amendments to the proposed section 99FA of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) (SIS Act) in the Treasury Laws Amendment (Delivering Better Financial Outcomes and Other Measures) Bill 2024 (Cth) (Bill), significantly decreasing the proposed regulatory burden on superannuation trustees regarding when they may deduct financial product advice fees from members’ superannuation.
-
Mar 27, 2024 |
lexology.com | Michael Vrisakis |Fiona Smedley |Andrew Eastwood |Luke Hastings |Alice Molan |Hugh Paynter | +3 more
Register now for your free, tailored, daily legal newsfeed service. Find out more about Lexology or get in touch by visiting our About page. RegisterIf you would like to learn how Lexology can drive your content marketing strategy forward, please email .
-
Feb 22, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Michael Vrisakis |Fiona Smedley |Maged Girgis |Tamanna Islam
It has been 5 years since Commissioner Hayne, in February 2019, released the Final Report of the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry (FSRC). It was a watershed moment for the financial services sector, with the rippling effects still being felt 5 years on. It is safe to say that the pre-FSRC financial services environment has been replaced by a new post-FSRC order.
-
Feb 13, 2024 |
mondaq.com | Michael Vrisakis |Maged Girgis |Andrew Bradley |Tamanna Islam
Increasingly, ASIC has sought to hold product issuers responsible for the conduct of other entities down the distribution chain. The recent case of ASIC v Diversa Trustees Limited [2023] FCA 1267 (Diversa) is an example of this. In this edition of Regulatory Rumbles, we explore this trend and examine the legal bases for holding product issuers responsible for the distribution conduct of their representatives, service providers and other intermediaries in the distribution chain.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →