Malik Asad

1 month ago | dawn.com | Malik Asad |Jawed Naqvi

ISLAMABAD: The Court of Special Judge Central on Tuesday approved two key petitions filed on behalf of PTI founder Imran Khan, allowing weekly telephone contact with his sons and the continuation of medical check-up by a personal physician. Judge Shahrukh Arjumand also sought an implementation report by April 28 from the officials concerned.

1 month ago | dawn.com | Malik Asad |Sumair Abdullah

KARACHI/ ISLAMABAD: While a judicial magistrate on Friday dismissed the post-arrest bail plea of journalist Farhan Mallick in a case related to alleged anti-state content on his YouTube channel, another granted bail to journalist Waheed Murad following his judicial remand in a case registered under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca). The “bail [application of Farhan Mallick] is dismissed,” Judicial Magistrate (East) Yusra Ashfaq pronounced in a verdict reserved a day earlier.

2 months ago | dawn.com | Kalbe Ali |Malik Asad

ISLAMABAD: Tensions began to ease around Lal Masjid in the G-6 sector of Islamabad on Wednesday after the blockade of roads leading to the mosque was relaxed by the capital police following an apparent patch-up between the government and the mosque management led by Maulana Abdul Aziz.

2 months ago | dawn.com | Malik Asad |Abbas Nasir |Muhammad Amir Rana

DAWN.COM E-Paper | March 02, 2025 Subscribe to notifications Get the latest news and updates from Dawn Not Now Allow Notifications Listen to article 1x 1.2x 1.5x ISLAMABAD: An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) has approved the post-arrest bail application of the accused in the hit-and-run case of Rangers personnel during the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s (PTI) November 26, 2024, protests in Islamabad.

2 months ago | dawn.com | Malik Asad |Arifa Noor |Jawed Naqvi

ISLAMABAD: The Lahore High Court Rawalpindi bench on Monday dismissed a petition filed by a former minister of Azad Kashmir seeking a halt to a drive to retrieve plots illegally occupied by him. LHC Justice Jawad Hassan after preliminary hearing of the petition ruled that since the petitioner was found to have encroached on private land, in the light of the judgements laid down by superior courts, he was not entitled to any interim relief.