Stephanie Gleason
California Litigation Editor at Bloomberg Law
California litigation editor for @Blaw. Formerly @TheDealNewsroom and @WSJBankruptcy. Also mom, Dodger fan & cat person. [email protected]
Articles
-
2 days ago |
news.bloombergtax.com | Alex Clearfield |Stephanie Gleason
Calls for the New York high court to finally end a long-time New York state circuit split—over when and whether legal aid attorneys representing low-income New Yorkers can be paid by the state—were bolstered by a new Manhattan appellate court opinion. The ruling from the court earlier this month said that, in certain cases, attorneys’ fees should be awarded to plaintiffs who “prevail” in lawsuits against state agencies, even if a judge hasn’t rendered a decision on the merits of the case.
-
6 days ago |
news.bloombergtax.com | Stephanie Gleason
The Office of Personnel Management that directed the termination of thousands of probationary workers at six federal agencies is prohibited from directing the termination of more employees, a federal judge ruled Friday, and agencies must clarify that the firings weren’t based on performance.
-
6 days ago |
news.bloombergtax.com | Maia Spoto |Stephanie Gleason
The Trump administration must stop deporting people to places other than their country of origin, so-called “third countries,” without giving them a chance to object, a Massachusetts federal judge ordered Friday.
-
1 week ago |
news.bloomberglaw.com | Stephanie Gleason
LitigationEmailApril 18, 2025, 1:41 AM UTCA Fifth Circuit panel vacated a $57 million penalty against AT&T Inc. Thursday, applying a recent US Supreme Court decision to find the Federal Communications Commission violated the telecom’s constitutional right to a jury trial. The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in SEC v. Jarkesy guided the panel’s finding, it said.
-
1 week ago |
news.bloombergtax.com | Stephanie Gleason
A Fifth Circuit panel vacated a $57 million penalty against AT&T Inc. Thursday, applying a recent US Supreme Court decision to find the Federal Communications Commission violated the telecom’s constitutional right to a jury trial. The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in SEC v. Jarkesy guided the panel’s finding, it said. “No one denies the Commission’s authority to enforce laws requiring telecommunications companies like AT&T to protect sensitive customer data,” Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan wrote.
Try JournoFinder For Free
Search and contact over 1M+ journalist profiles, browse 100M+ articles, and unlock powerful PR tools.
Start Your 7-Day Free Trial →X (formerly Twitter)
- Followers
- 1K
- Tweets
- 475
- DMs Open
- No
RT @BLaw: BREAKING: The Texas Supreme Court says a Dallas-area woman isn’t entitled to an emergency abortion to protect her health and futu…
Subscribe to our new newsletter for all your state policy news!
Policy news that matters. Sign up for the States of Play newsletter for your guide to state government policies that affect businesses and workers, delivered daily: https://t.co/YRQJOij4Aa https://t.co/I4tcu6ne6z
RT @BGOV: Policy news that matters. Sign up for the States of Play newsletter for your guide to state government policies that affect busi…
