-
Nov 27, 2024 | 
mondaq.com | Maura Mastrony |Jonathan Levine
This podcast features an in-depth discussion with Littler
attorneys Maura Mastrony and Jonathan Levine about recent decisions
from the National Labor Relations Board that overturned decades of
precedent and what employers might expect moving forward.
Listen on SoundCloud | All Littler Podcasts
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
-
Nov 22, 2024 | 
mondaq.com | Rachel Marie Ring |Maura Mastrony
The recent NLRB decision finding that mandatory employer
meetings involving unionization discussions are unlawful includes
other points that will affect employers.
Board majority seems to have narrowed the circumstances under
which an employer may publicize existing benefits and rely on
"past practice" to solicit employee grievances during a
union campaign.
Decision adds to the rapidly growing list of employer
statements the majority believes constitute an unlawful
threat.
-
Nov 22, 2024 | 
mondaq.com | Jonathan Levine |Maura Mastrony |Rachel Marie Ring
LM
Littler Mendelson
More
With more than 1,800 labor and employment attorneys in offices around the world, Littler provides workplace solutions that are local, everywhere.
-
Nov 21, 2024 | 
jdsupra.com | Maura Mastrony |Rachel Marie Ring
The recent NLRB decision finding that mandatory employer meetings involving unionization discussions are unlawful includes other points that will affect employers. Board majority seems to have narrowed the circumstances under which an employer may publicize existing benefits and rely on “past practice” to solicit employee grievances during a union campaign. Decision adds to the rapidly growing list of employer statements the majority believes constitute an unlawful threat.
-
Nov 21, 2024 | 
jdsupra.com | Jonathan Levine |Maura Mastrony |Rachel Marie Ring
The NLRB overturned decades-old precedent by finding that mandatory meetings about unionization are unlawful. The decision also seemingly narrowed the circumstances under which an employer may rely on “past practice” to solicit employee grievances during a union campaign and added to the list of employer statements it will find to constitute an unlawful threat. This decision is far-reaching and subject to appeal.
-
Nov 20, 2024 | 
littler.com | Jonathan Levine |Maura Mastrony |Rachel Marie Ring
The NLRB overturned decades-old precedent by finding that mandatory meetings about unionization are unlawful. The decision also seemingly narrowed the circumstances under which an employer may rely on “past practice” to solicit employee grievances during a union campaign and added to the list of employer statements it will find to constitute an unlawful threat. This decision is far-reaching and subject to appeal.
-
Nov 20, 2024 | 
littler.com | Rachel Marie Ring |Maura Mastrony
The recent NLRB decision finding that mandatory employer meetings involving unionization discussions are unlawful includes other points that will affect employers. Board majority seems to have narrowed the circumstances under which an employer may publicize existing benefits and rely on “past practice” to solicit employee grievances during a union campaign. Decision adds to the rapidly growing list of employer statements the majority believes constitute an unlawful threat.
-
Oct 11, 2024 | 
mondaq.com | Jason R. Stanevich |Maura Mastrony |Emily Zaklukiewicz
A recent Sixth Circuit decision provides some guidance to
employers regarding bargaining obligations during exigent
circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health
emergencies.
In general, an employer can make unilateral decisions to
address unforeseen circumstances that have a major effect on the
economics of its operations, but this right is not without
limits.
In National Labor Relations Board v. Metro Man IV, LLC,
Case No. 07-CA-264407 (6th Cir. Aug.
-
Oct 10, 2024 | 
jdsupra.com | Ian Beck |Maura Mastrony |Jason R. Stanevich
A recent Sixth Circuit decision provides some guidance to employers regarding bargaining obligations during exigent circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health emergencies. In general, an employer can make unilateral decisions to address unforeseen circumstances that have a major effect on the economics of its operations, but this right is not without limits. In National Labor Relations Board v. Metro Man IV, LLC, Case No. 07-CA-264407 (6th Cir. Aug.
-
Oct 9, 2024 | 
littler.com | Jason R. Stanevich |Maura Mastrony |Emily Zaklukiewicz |Ian Beck
A recent Sixth Circuit decision provides some guidance to employers regarding bargaining obligations during exigent circumstances like the COVID-19 pandemic or other public health emergencies. In general, an employer can make unilateral decisions to address unforeseen circumstances that have a major effect on the economics of its operations, but this right is not without limits. In National Labor Relations Board v. Metro Man IV, LLC, Case No. 07-CA-264407 (6th Cir. Aug.
